Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 2006–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Evans v. Stategreen2 sentences2013For non-testimonial hearsay evidence to be admissible under the necessity exception, not only must the declarant be unavailable and his statement be relevant to a material fact and be more probative as to that fact than other evidence that may be procured and offered, but the statement also must exhibit “particularized guarantees of trustworthiness.” McNaughton v. State, 290 Ga. 894, 897-898 (3) (b) ( 725 SE2d 590 ) (2012); Evans v. State, 288 Ga. 571, 572 (2) ( 707 SE2d 353 ) (2011). 2013For non-testimonial hearsay evidence to be admissible under the necessity exception, not only must the declarant be unavailable and his statement be relevant to a material fact and be more probative as to that fact than other evidence that may be procured and offered, but the statement also must exhibit “particularized guarantees of trustworthiness.” McNaughton v. State, 290 Ga. 894, 897-898 (3) (b) ( 725 SE2d 590 ) (2012); Evans v. State, 288 Ga. 571, 572 (2) ( 707 SE2d 353 ) (2011). | 1 | 1 |
McNaughton v. Stategreen2 sentences2013For non-testimonial hearsay evidence to be admissible under the necessity exception, not only must the declarant be unavailable and his statement be relevant to a material fact and be more probative as to that fact than other evidence that may be procured and offered, but the statement also must exhibit “particularized guarantees of trustworthiness.” McNaughton v. State, 290 Ga. 894, 897-898 (3) (b) ( 725 SE2d 590 ) (2012); Evans v. State, 288 Ga. 571, 572 (2) ( 707 SE2d 353 ) (2011). 2013For non-testimonial hearsay evidence to be admissible under the necessity exception, not only must the declarant be unavailable and his statement be relevant to a material fact and be more probative as to that fact than other evidence that may be procured and offered, but the statement also must exhibit “particularized guarantees of trustworthiness.” McNaughton v. State, 290 Ga. 894, 897-898 (3) (b) ( 725 SE2d 590 ) (2012); Evans v. State, 288 Ga. 571, 572 (2) ( 707 SE2d 353 ) (2011). | 1 | 1 |
Brooks v. Stategreen2 sentences2012Brooks v. State, 281 Ga. 514, 517-518 (4) ( 640 SE2d 280 ) (2007). 2012Brooks v. State, 281 Ga. 514, 517-518 (4) ( 640 SE2d 280 ) (2007). | 1 | 1 |
Azizi v. Stategreen2 sentences2009There are two requirements under the necessity exception, “necessity” and “particularized guarantees of trustworthiness.” Azizi v. State, 270 Ga. 709, 711 (2) ( 512 SE2d 622 ) (1999). 2009There are two requirements under the necessity exception, “necessity” and “particularized guarantees of trustworthiness.” Azizi v. State, 270 Ga. 709, 711 (2) ( 512 SE2d 622 ) (1999). | 1 | 1 |
Watson v. Stategreen2 sentences2007In order for hearsay to be admitted under the necessity exception, two requirements must be satisfied: “necessity” and “particularized guarantees of trustworthiness.” [Cits.] “Necessity” is demonstrated when the declarant is deceased, when the statement is shown to be relevant to a material fact, and when the statement is more probative of the material fact than other evidence that may be produced and offered. [Cit.] The requirement of “particularized guarantees of trustworthiness” is satisfied when the declaration is coupled with “circumstances which attribute verity to [the declaration].” [C 2007In order for hearsay to be admitted under the necessity exception, two requirements must be satisfied: “necessity” and “particularized guarantees of trustworthiness.” [Cits.] “Necessity” is demonstrated when the declarant is deceased, when the statement is shown to be relevant to a material fact, and when the statement is more probative of the material fact than other evidence that may be produced and offered. [Cit.] The requirement of “particularized guarantees of trustworthiness” is satisfied when the declaration is coupled with “circumstances which attribute verity to [the declaration].” [C | 1 | 1 |
Chapel v. Stategreen2 sentences2006See generally Chapel v. State, 270 Ga. 151, 155 (4) ( 510 SE2d 802 ) (1998). 2006See generally Chapel v. State, 270 Ga. 151, 155 (4) ( 510 SE2d 802 ) (1998). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Turner v. State
green
2 sentences2007Turner v. State, 281 Ga. 647 (3) (a) ( 641 SE2d 527 ) (2007) (consistent statements to close friends in whom victim confided both at work and as confidants outside of work carried particularized guarantees of trustworthiness); McPherson v. State, 274 Ga. 444 (10) ( 553 SE2d 569 ) (2001) (circumstantial guaranty of trustworthiness shown by testimony that witnesses were close friends in whom victim routinely confided with respect to personal life). *332 3. 2007Turner v. State, 281 Ga. 647 (3) (a) ( 641 SE2d 527 ) (2007) (consistent statements to close friends in whom victim confided both at work and as confidants outside of work carried particularized guarantees of trustworthiness); McPherson v. State, 274 Ga. 444 (10) ( 553 SE2d 569 ) (2001) (circumstantial guaranty of trustworthiness shown by testimony that witnesses were close friends in whom victim routinely confided with respect to personal life). *332 3. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
McPherson v. State
green
2 sentences2007Turner v. State, 281 Ga. 647 (3) (a) ( 641 SE2d 527 ) (2007) (consistent statements to close friends in whom victim confided both at work and as confidants outside of work carried particularized guarantees of trustworthiness); McPherson v. State, 274 Ga. 444 (10) ( 553 SE2d 569 ) (2001) (circumstantial guaranty of trustworthiness shown by testimony that witnesses were close friends in whom victim routinely confided with respect to personal life). *332 3. 2007Turner v. State, 281 Ga. 647 (3) (a) ( 641 SE2d 527 ) (2007) (consistent statements to close friends in whom victim confided both at work and as confidants outside of work carried particularized guarantees of trustworthiness); McPherson v. State, 274 Ga. 444 (10) ( 553 SE2d 569 ) (2001) (circumstantial guaranty of trustworthiness shown by testimony that witnesses were close friends in whom victim routinely confided with respect to personal life). *332 3. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.