5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2008–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2024“Even if a defendant shows that particular errors of counsel were unreasonable . . . , the defendant must show that they actually had an adverse effect on the defense.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 693 . 2008We conclude the objective standard proposed by Kirehner for the measurement of prejudice would undermine Strickland’s requirement that the applicant demonstrate counsel’s unprofessional errors “ac tually had an adverse effect on the defense.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 693 , 104 S.Ct. at 2067 , 80 L.Ed.2d at 696 (emphasis added). | 3 | 4 |
State of Iowa v. Robert Lynn Vaughangreen1 sentence2018See id. 498–99 (“Vaughan next alleges his pretrial counsel, Henson, labored under an impermissible conflict of interest that requires us to grant a new trial.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hill v. Lockhart
green
1 sentence2021Id. (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 693 (1984)). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.