Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 2016–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Caseygreen2 sentences2016See Iowa Supreme Ct. Att’y Disciplinary Bd. v. Casey, 761 N.W.2d 53, 62 (Iowa 2009). 2016See Iowa Supreme Ct. Att’y Disciplinary Bd. v. Casey, 761 N.W.2d 53, 62 (Iowa 2009). | 3 | 3 |
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. David A. Morsegreen2 sentences2025See Morse, 887 N.W.2d at 146 (“We consider whether the attorney has a colorable claim to the fees. . . . 2019In order to determine whether Parrish violated rule 32:8.4(b) and (c), however, we must consider whether Parrish has validly asserted a colorable future claim of right to the funds. *179 In Morse , which involved $ 1400 that had been given to an attorney to cover court reporter fees, we said, "We consider whether the attorney has a colorable claim to the fees." Morse , 887 N.W.2d at 146 . | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. Nadler
green
1 sentence2019Id. at 146 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.