Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Charles H. Cartergreen2 sentences2004Consequently, even if the trial court gives a carefully crafted instruction limiting the significance of such evidence, prejudice to the defendant is “well-nigh inescapable.” United States v. Carter, 482 F.2d 738, 740 (D.C.Cir.1973). 2001Consequently, even if the trial judge gives a carefully crafted instruction limiting the significance of such evidence, prejudice to the defendant is “well-nigh inescapable.” United States v. Carter, 482 F.2d 738, 740 (D.C.Cir.1973). | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Louis San Martingreen2 sentences2004Therefore the rule against bad-acts evidence is “ ‘just and wise’ in order to avoid the enormous danger of prejudice to the defendant that [such evidence] creates.... ” United States v. San Martin, 505 F.2d 918, 921 (5th Cir.1974). 2001The rule against bad-acts evidence is therefore “ ‘just and wise’ in order to avoid the enormous danger of prejudice to the defendant that [such evidence] creates.” United States v. San Martin, 505 F.2d 918, 921 (5th Cir.1974). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Sullivangreen2 sentences2015“Consequently, even if the trial court gives a carefully crafted instruction limiting the significance of such evidence, prejudice to the defendant is well-nigh inescapable.” Id. (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). 2005See Sullivan, 679 N.W.2d at 24 (“[E]ven if the court gives a carefully crafted instruction limiting the significance of [prior-bad-acts] evidence, prejudice to the defendant is Vell-nigh inescapable.’ ” (Citation omitted.)). | 1 | 2 |
IES Utilities Inc. v. Iowa Department of Revenue & Financegreen2 sentences2017See IES Utils., Inc. v. Iowa Dep’t of Rev., 545 N.W.2d 536, 538 (Iowa 1996) (stating chapter 17A is a carefully crafted framework requiring litigants “to follow the rules as a prerequisite to obtaining proper access to the 6 district court for judicial review—a voyage “referred to as the ‘exhaustion’ requirement”). 2017We require an exhaustion of administrative remedies in order to honor “agency expertise,” to handle “matters within an agency and not in the courts,” and to preserve “precious judicial resources.” IES, 545 N.W.2d at 538 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||