Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 2017–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State of Iowa v. James Norman Harrisgreen2 sentences2024While I agree with the majority’s conclusion that there is sufficient evidence to uphold Schwartz’s conviction, “that conclusion does not control our determination of whether prejudice flowed from the flawed marshalling instruction[s].” State v. Harris, 891 N.W.2d 182, 189 (Iowa 2017). 2020We noted that the existence of substantial evidence to support a finding of movement “does not control our determination of whether prejudice flowed from the flawed marshalling instruction.” Id. at 189 . | 1 | 4 |
Neder v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2017Upon review of the record, we conclude our confidence in the jury verdict is undermined because the evidence of Harris’s movement was not great and the flawed jury instruction did not require the jury to make a finding on that ___________________________ 294, 299 (Iowa 2009) (noting some jurisdictions apply the harmless error analysis applied by the United States Supreme Court in Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1, 10 , 119 S. Ct. 1827, 1834 , 144 L. 2017Upon review of the record, we conclude our confidence in the jury verdict is undermined because the evidence of Harris’s movement was not great and the flawed jury instruction did not require the jury to make a finding on that ___________________________ 294, 299 (Iowa 2009) (noting some jurisdictions apply the harmless error analysis applied by the United States Supreme Court in Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1, 10 , 119 S. Ct. 1827, 1834 , 144 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||