Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Feddersengreen2 sentences1996We disapproved the Lord Hale instruction in State v. Feddersen, 230 N.W.2d 510, 514-15 (Iowa 1975). 1996We disapproved the Lord Hale instruction in State v. Feddersen, 230 N.W.2d 510, 514-15 (Iowa 1975). | 4 | 4 |
Mark v. Stategreen2 sentences2022See Mark v. State, 556 N.W.2d 152, 154 (Iowa 1996) (citing Feddersen, 230 N.W.2d at 514–15). 2022See Mark v. State, 556 N.W.2d 152, 154 (Iowa 1996) (citing Feddersen, 230 N.W.2d at 514–15). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Brooksgreen2 sentences1996See State v. Brooks, 181 Iowa 874, 890 , 165 N.W. 194 , 199 (1917). 1996See State v. Brooks, 181 Iowa 874, 890 , 165 N.W. 194 , 199 (1917). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Wrightgreen1 sentence1981See also State v. Wright, 274 N.W.2d 307, 314 (Iowa 1979); State v. Hall, 235 N.W.2d 702, 725 (Iowa 1975); State v. Milliken, 204 N.W.2d 594, 596-97 (Iowa 1973). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Millikengreen1 sentence1981See also State v. Wright, 274 N.W.2d 307, 314 (Iowa 1979); State v. Hall, 235 N.W.2d 702, 725 (Iowa 1975); State v. Milliken, 204 N.W.2d 594, 596-97 (Iowa 1973). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bestergreen1 sentence1981Moreover, this court has disapproved instructions which “single out any witness and burden his testimony with any suggestion which might indicate to the jury that the court believed the witness was likely to testify falsely.” State v. Feddersen, 230 N.W.2d 510, 515 (Iowa 1975) (disapproving Lord Hale instruction); see State v. Bester, 167 N.W.2d 705 (Iowa 1969) (disapproving specific instruction relating to the defendant’s credibility); State v. Asbury, 172 Iowa 606, 614 , 154 N.W. 915 , 918 (1915) (“This court has held, as have many others, very many times, that though an instruction upon the | 1 | 1 |
State v. Asburygreen1 sentence1981Moreover, this court has disapproved instructions which “single out any witness and burden his testimony with any suggestion which might indicate to the jury that the court believed the witness was likely to testify falsely.” State v. Feddersen, 230 N.W.2d 510, 515 (Iowa 1975) (disapproving Lord Hale instruction); see State v. Bester, 167 N.W.2d 705 (Iowa 1969) (disapproving specific instruction relating to the defendant’s credibility); State v. Asbury, 172 Iowa 606, 614 , 154 N.W. 915 , 918 (1915) (“This court has held, as have many others, very many times, that though an instruction upon the | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hallgreen1 sentence1981See also State v. Wright, 274 N.W.2d 307, 314 (Iowa 1979); State v. Hall, 235 N.W.2d 702, 725 (Iowa 1975); State v. Milliken, 204 N.W.2d 594, 596-97 (Iowa 1973). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Taylor v. State
green
2 sentences1975Taylor v. State, 257 Ind. 664 , 278 N.E.2d 273 (1972). (3.) The instruction . further arbitrarily singles out rape victims as a class whose credibility is suspect. 1975Taylor v. State, 257 Ind. 664 , 278 N.E.2d 273 (1972). (3.) The instruction . further arbitrarily singles out rape victims as a class whose credibility is suspect. | 1 | 1975–1975 |