Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 1993–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Allegre v. Iowa State Board of Regentsgreen2 sentences2002A contested case is a proceeding “in which the legal rights, duties or privileges of a party are required by Constitution or statute to be determined by an agency after an opportunity for an eviden-tiary hearing.” Iowa Code § 17A.2(5); accord Bernau, 580 N.W.2d at 766 ; Messamaker v. Iowa Dep’t of Human Servs., 545 N.W.2d 566, 567 (Iowa 1996); Citizens’ Aide/Ombudsman, 454 N.W.2d at 817-18 ; Allegre, 349 N.W.2d at 114 ; Polk County, 330 N.W.2d at 277 . 1993This evidentiary hearing is “ ‘an oral proceeding whose purpose is to determine disputed facts of particular applicability known as adjudicative facts — the who, what, when, where, and why of particular individuals in specified circumstances.’ ” Allegre v. Iowa State Bd. of Regents, 349 N.W.2d 112, 114 (Iowa 1984) (quoting Bonfield, The Definition of Formal Agency Adjudication Under the Iowa *709 Administrative Procedure Act, 63 Iowa L.Rev. 285, 294 (1977)). | 1 | 2 |
Greenwood Manor v. Iowa Department of Public Health, State Health Facilities Councilgreen1 sentence2017Health, 641 N.W.2d 823, 834 (Iowa 2002) (quoting Iowa Code § 17A.2(5) (1999)). | 1 | 1 |
Messamaker v. Iowa Department of Human Servicesgreen1 sentence2002A contested case is a proceeding “in which the legal rights, duties or privileges of a party are required by Constitution or statute to be determined by an agency after an opportunity for an eviden-tiary hearing.” Iowa Code § 17A.2(5); accord Bernau, 580 N.W.2d at 766 ; Messamaker v. Iowa Dep’t of Human Servs., 545 N.W.2d 566, 567 (Iowa 1996); Citizens’ Aide/Ombudsman, 454 N.W.2d at 817-18 ; Allegre, 349 N.W.2d at 114 ; Polk County, 330 N.W.2d at 277 . | 1 | 1 |
Bernau v. Iowa Department of Transportationgreen1 sentence2002A contested case is a proceeding “in which the legal rights, duties or privileges of a party are required by Constitution or statute to be determined by an agency after an opportunity for an eviden-tiary hearing.” Iowa Code § 17A.2(5); accord Bernau, 580 N.W.2d at 766 ; Messamaker v. Iowa Dep’t of Human Servs., 545 N.W.2d 566, 567 (Iowa 1996); Citizens’ Aide/Ombudsman, 454 N.W.2d at 817-18 ; Allegre, 349 N.W.2d at 114 ; Polk County, 330 N.W.2d at 277 . | 1 | 1 |
Office of Consumer Advocate v. Iowa State Commerce Commissiongreen1 sentence1999See also Office of Consumer Advocate v. Iowa State Commerce Comm’n, 465 N.W.2d 280, 284 (Iowa 1991); Polk County, 330 N.W.2d at 277 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Polk County Iowa v. Iowa State Appeal Board
green
2 sentences2002A contested case is a proceeding “in which the legal rights, duties or privileges of a party are required by Constitution or statute to be determined by an agency after an opportunity for an eviden-tiary hearing.” Iowa Code § 17A.2(5); accord Bernau, 580 N.W.2d at 766 ; Messamaker v. Iowa Dep’t of Human Servs., 545 N.W.2d 566, 567 (Iowa 1996); Citizens’ Aide/Ombudsman, 454 N.W.2d at 817-18 ; Allegre, 349 N.W.2d at 114 ; Polk County, 330 N.W.2d at 277 . 1999See also Office of Consumer Advocate v. Iowa State Commerce Comm’n, 465 N.W.2d 280, 284 (Iowa 1991); Polk County, 330 N.W.2d at 277 . | 2 | 1999–2002 |
Langley v. Scurr
green
1 sentence2009We held chapter 17A did not apply to prison disciplinary proceedings because contested cases included only those proceedings required by statute or the constitution “ ‘to be determined by an agency after an opportunity for an eviden-tiary hearing.’” Id. (quoting Iowa Code § 17A.2(2) (1981)). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Citizens' Aide/Ombudsman v. Rolfes
green
1 sentence2002A contested case is a proceeding “in which the legal rights, duties or privileges of a party are required by Constitution or statute to be determined by an agency after an opportunity for an eviden-tiary hearing.” Iowa Code § 17A.2(5); accord Bernau, 580 N.W.2d at 766 ; Messamaker v. Iowa Dep’t of Human Servs., 545 N.W.2d 566, 567 (Iowa 1996); Citizens’ Aide/Ombudsman, 454 N.W.2d at 817-18 ; Allegre, 349 N.W.2d at 114 ; Polk County, 330 N.W.2d at 277 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.