Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
The Estate of Erika L. Herren Anderson, by and Through Its Duly Appointed Administrator, Todd Herren and Todd Herren, Individually and as Next Best Friend and Natural Father of Ryan Herren, a Minor, and Brynn Herren, a Minor v. Iowa Dermatology Clinic, PLC, a Corporation Charles W. Love, an Individual and Pathology Laboratory, P.C., a Corporation N/K/A Iowa Pathology Associates, P.C.green1 sentence2022The existence of a fiduciary duty, such as that between a physician and his patient, “relaxes the requirement of affirmative 14 concealment,” Est. of Anderson, 819 N.W.2d at 415 (emphasis added), such that silence can supply the concealment, but “the act of concealment must [still] be independent of and subsequent to the original wrongdoing establishing liability.” Skadburg, 911 N.W.2d at 798 . | 1 | 1 |
Stroh Corp. v. K & S DEVELOPMENT CORP.green1 sentence1978Stroh Corp. v. K. & S. Development Corp., 247 N.W.2d 750, 753 (Iowa 1976). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Michelle R. Skadburg v. Gary Gately and Whitfield and Eddy, PLC
green
1 sentence2022The existence of a fiduciary duty, such as that between a physician and his patient, “relaxes the requirement of affirmative 14 concealment,” Est. of Anderson, 819 N.W.2d at 415 (emphasis added), such that silence can supply the concealment, but “the act of concealment must [still] be independent of and subsequent to the original wrongdoing establishing liability.” Skadburg, 911 N.W.2d at 798 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Meier v. Alfa-Laval, Inc.
green
1 sentence2022Recognizing this distinction, fundamental “to the first element, a party relying on the doctrine of fraudulent concealment must prove the defendant did some affirmative act to conceal the plaintiff’s cause of action independent of and subsequent to the liability-producing conduct.” Id. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Christy v. Miulli
green
2 sentences2021But to do so, the party relying on the doctrine “must prove the [other party] did some affirmative act to conceal the plaintiff’s cause of action independent of and subsequent to the liability-producing conduct.” Id. 2021And “the plaintiff’s reliance must be reasonable.” Id. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Peterson
green
1 sentence1997Id. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Bolinger v. Kiburz
green
1 sentence1984Id. at 605 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.