Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kendall v. Lowthergreen2 sentences2024See Kendall v. Lowther, 356 N.W.2d 181 , 188–89 (Iowa 1984). 2020“The doctrine of practical location, as recognized and defined in Iowa cases, is grounded on principles of express agreement, estoppel and equity.” Kendall v. Lowther, 356 N.W.2d 181, 188 (Iowa 1984). | 3 | 3 |
Schauland v. Schmaltzgreen2 sentences2024But for the doctrine to apply, 6In Schauland, we affirmed the district court’s ruling based on the doctrine of practical location, although we indicated there was “support in the record” for boundary by acquiescence. 107 N.W.2d at 70 . 2024But for the doctrine to apply, 6In Schauland, we affirmed the district court’s ruling based on the doctrine of practical location, although we indicated there was “support in the record” for boundary by acquiescence. 107 N.W.2d at 70 . | 1 | 3 |
Trimpl v. Meyergreen2 sentences1984Trimpl v. Meyer, 246 Iowa 1245, 1253-54 , 71 N.W.2d 437, 441-42 (1955). 1984Trimpl v. Meyer, 246 Iowa 1245, 1253-54 , 71 N.W.2d 437, 441-42 (1955). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.