Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1901–1988 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bannon v. Pfiffnergreen1 sentence1988Bannon v. Pfeffner, 333 N.W.2d 464, 469 (Iowa 1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kisling v. Thierman
green
2 sentences1983Kisling also held, however, that a violation of a statutory rule of the road may be legally excused in four situations, one of which is when the driver “is confronted by an emergency not of his own making, and by reason thereof he fails to obey the statute.” 214 Iowa at 916 , 243 N.W. at 554 . 1983Kisling also held, however, that a violation of a statutory rule of the road may be legally excused in four situations, one of which is when the driver “is confronted by an emergency not of his own making, and by reason thereof he fails to obey the statute.” 214 Iowa at 916 , 243 N.W. at 554 . | 2 | 1933–1983 |
Engle v. Nelson
green
2 sentences1956In the case of Engle v. Nelson, 220 Iowa 771, 777 , 263 N.W. 505, 509 , the court said as follows: “It is elementary, and we have frequently held, that a violation of a statutory requirement is immaterial if such violation was not a direct or contributing cause of the injury. 1956In the case of Engle v. Nelson, 220 Iowa 771, 777 , 263 N.W. 505, 509 , the court said as follows: “It is elementary, and we have frequently held, that a violation of a statutory requirement is immaterial if such violation was not a direct or contributing cause of the injury. | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Ryan v. Trenkle
green
2 sentences1956In the Ryan case, supra [Ryan v. Trenkle, 203 Iowa 443, 445 , 212 N.W. 888 ], we said: ‘Was the failure, if any, of the driver of the automobile to give the statutory or other warning signals a proximate cause of the injury claimed? 1956In the Ryan case, supra [Ryan v. Trenkle, 203 Iowa 443, 445 , 212 N.W. 888 ], we said: ‘Was the failure, if any, of the driver of the automobile to give the statutory or other warning signals a proximate cause of the injury claimed? | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Ford v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
green
1 sentence1901Dodge v. Railway Co., 34 Iowa, 279 ; Ford v Railway Co., 91 Iowa, 179 ; Tobey v. Railway Co., 94 Iowa, 256 ; 1 Shearman & Redfield Negligence, section 13. | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Tobey v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.
neutral
1 sentence1901Dodge v. Railway Co., 34 Iowa, 279 ; Ford v Railway Co., 91 Iowa, 179 ; Tobey v. Railway Co., 94 Iowa, 256 ; 1 Shearman & Redfield Negligence, section 13. | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.