document requirement (Idaho) · Go Syfert
← Idaho issues

document requirement in Idaho

5 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 2006–2023 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Charles Hartgrave v. City of Twin Falls and SIFgreen
idaho · 2018 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023“We construe [Idaho Appellate Rule] 11.2 in the same manner as [Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure Rule] 11(a)(1) because they have identical wording. [A]ttorney fees can be awarded as sanctions when a party or attorney violates either (a) the frivolous filings clause or (b) the improper purpose clause.” Hartgrave v. City of Twin Falls, 163 Idaho 347 , 357, 413 P.3d 747, 757 (2018) (quoting Andrews v. State Indus.

11
Bankers Trust Co. v. Mallisgreen
scotus · 1978 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
2 sentences

2023See Bankers Trust Co. v. Mallis, 435 U.S. 381, 384 , 98 S. Ct. 1117, 1120 , 55 L.Ed.2d 357 (1978) (The “sole purpose” of the separate document requirement is “to clarify when the time for appeal . . . begins to run”).

2023See Bankers Trust Co. v. Mallis, 435 U.S. 381, 384 , 98 S. Ct. 1117, 1120 , 55 L.Ed.2d 357 (1978) (The “sole purpose” of the separate document requirement is “to clarify when the time for appeal . . . begins to run”).

11
Camp v. East Fork Ditch Co., Ltd.green
idaho · 2002 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
2 sentences

2010In addition, Goodman Oil argues that I.R.C.P. 58(a) has been interpreted in Hunting v. Clark County School Dist., 129 Idaho 634 , 931 P.2d 628 (1997), Camp v. East Fork Ditch Co., Ltd., 137 Idaho 850 , 55 P.3d 304 *591 (2002), and In re Universe Life Ins.

2010In addition, Goodman Oil argues that I.R.C.P. 58(a) has been interpreted in Hunting v. Clark County School Dist., 129 Idaho 634 , 931 P.2d 628 (1997), Camp v. East Fork Ditch Co., Ltd., 137 Idaho 850 , 55 P.3d 304 *591 (2002), and In re Universe Life Ins.

11
Asarco Inc. v. Stategreen
idaho · 2003 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006In previous cases, this Court has articulated the following factors in determining whether a document is a rule: a rule “(1) has wide coverage; (2) applies generally and uniformly; (3) operates only in future cases; (4) prescribes a legal standard or directive not otherwise provided by the enabling statute; (5) expresses agency policy not previously expressed; and (6) is an interpretation of law or general policy.” Asarco Inc. v. State, 138 Idaho 719, 723 , 69 P.3d 139, 143 (2003).

2006In previous cases, this Court has articulated the following factors in determining whether a document is a rule: a rule “(1) has wide coverage; (2) applies generally and uniformly; (3) operates only in future cases; (4) prescribes a legal standard or directive not otherwise provided by the enabling statute; (5) expresses agency policy not previously expressed; and (6) is an interpretation of law or general policy.” Asarco Inc. v. State, 138 Idaho 719, 723 , 69 P.3d 139, 143 (2003).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Hunting v. Clark County School District No. 161 green
idaho · 1997
2 sentences

2010In addition, Goodman Oil argues that I.R.C.P. 58(a) has been interpreted in Hunting v. Clark County School Dist., 129 Idaho 634 , 931 P.2d 628 (1997), Camp v. East Fork Ditch Co., Ltd., 137 Idaho 850 , 55 P.3d 304 *591 (2002), and In re Universe Life Ins.

2010In addition, Goodman Oil argues that I.R.C.P. 58(a) has been interpreted in Hunting v. Clark County School Dist., 129 Idaho 634 , 931 P.2d 628 (1997), Camp v. East Fork Ditch Co., Ltd., 137 Idaho 850 , 55 P.3d 304 *591 (2002), and In re Universe Life Ins.

22010–2010

Statutes the citing opinions construe

ID § Idaho Code § 12-120 (3) ID § Idaho Code § 12-121 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 24 (1955–2025) TX 20 (1974–2022) MD 19 (2000–2021) NY 13 (1966–2020) HI 9 (1996–2022) MI 9 (2007–2024) IL 9 (1988–2020) FL 7 (1990–2021) DC 6 (1997–2017) ID 5 (2006–2023) IA 5 (1988–2021) LA 5 (1952–2016) NE 5 (1986–2024) UT 4 (2000–2025) NJ 4 (1959–2019) MA 4 (1937–2026) AZ 3 (1993–2007) OH 3 (2003–2024) AK 3 (1979–2017) AL 3 (1920–1982) GA 3 (1981–1986) PA 3 (1993–2024) CT 2 (1966–1992) WA 2 (1994–2010) VA 2 (2009–2015) SD 2 (2006–2020) MO 2 (1902–1984) VT 2 (2012–2012) MN 2 (1975–2005) WV 2 (2004–2008) TN 2 (1996–2013) MS 2 (2003–2005)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check