Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Koehn v. Rigginsgreen2 sentences2008In Riggins v. Smith, 126 Idaho 1017 , 895 P.2d 1210 (1995), this Court said that an attorney is required to perform a prefiling inquiry into both the facts and the law to satisfy the affirmative duty imposed by Idaho R. 2008In Riggins v. Smith, 126 Idaho 1017 , 895 P.2d 1210 (1995), this Court said that an attorney is required to perform a prefiling inquiry into both the facts and the law to satisfy the affirmative duty imposed by Idaho R. | 1 | 2 |
Durrant v. Christensengreen2 sentences2023Compare Durrant v. Christensen, 117 Idaho 70, 74 , 785 P.2d 634, 638 (1990) (Rule 11 imposes “a duty to make a reasonable inquiry prior to filing an action”) (emphasis added) with Thomas v. Capital Sec. 2023Compare Durrant v. Christensen, 117 Idaho 70, 74 , 785 P.2d 634, 638 (1990) (Rule 11 imposes “a duty to make a reasonable inquiry prior to filing an action”) (emphasis added) with Thomas v. Capital Sec. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gilbert v. Radnovich
green
2 sentences2024Idaho Code section 12-123(1)(d) further provides that “an award of reasonable attorney’s fees pursuant to this section may be made against a party, his counsel of record, or both.” A trial judge’s decision to award sanctions against an attorney is “influenced by a host of factors,” and those factors are specific to the facts of each case and include considering the “attorney’s 13 credibility in signing a complaint and evaluating whether an attorney’s prefiling inquiry was reasonable based on all circumstances.” Gilbert v. Radnovich, 171 Idaho 566 , 573, 524 P.3d 397 , 404 (2023). 2024Idaho Code section 12-123(1)(d) further provides that “an award of reasonable attorney’s fees pursuant to this section may be made against a party, his counsel of record, or both.” A trial judge’s decision to award sanctions against an attorney is “influenced by a host of factors,” and those factors are specific to the facts of each case and include considering the “attorney’s 13 credibility in signing a complaint and evaluating whether an attorney’s prefiling inquiry was reasonable based on all circumstances.” Gilbert v. Radnovich, 171 Idaho 566 , 573, 524 P.3d 397 , 404 (2023). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.
green
2 sentences1995Sun Valley, 119 Idaho at 95 , 803 P.2d at 1001 ; Stevens, 116 Idaho at 532 , 777 P.2d at 1205 . 1995Sun Valley, 119 Idaho at 95 , 803 P.2d at 1001 ; Stevens, 116 Idaho at 532 , 777 P.2d at 1205 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Stevens v. Fleming
green
2 sentences1995Sun Valley, 119 Idaho at 95 , 803 P.2d at 1001 ; Stevens, 116 Idaho at 532 , 777 P.2d at 1205 . 1995Sun Valley, 119 Idaho at 95 , 803 P.2d at 1001 ; Stevens, 116 Idaho at 532 , 777 P.2d at 1205 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.