Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 1995–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Locker v. HOW SOEL, INC.green2 sentences2016The Commission found that Claimant committed three acts constituting misconduct, the last of which was insubordination. 1 “This Court has recognized insubordination as one form of conduct that violates the standard-of-behavior test.” Locker v. How Soel, Inc., 151 Idaho 696, 700 , 263 P.3d 750, 754 (2011). 2016The Commission found that Claimant committed three acts constituting misconduct, the last of which was insubordination. 1 “This Court has recognized insubordination as one form of conduct that violates the standard-of-behavior test.” Locker v. How Soel, Inc., 151 Idaho 696, 700 , 263 P.3d 750, 754 (2011). | 1 | 1 |
Harris v. Electrical Wholesalegreen2 sentences2014When a discharge is based on an employee’s violation of a standard of behavior, “to meet the standard-of-behavior test and prove discharge for misconduct, an employer’s expectations are ordinarily reasonable only where they have been communicated to the employee.” Harris v. Electrical Wholesale, 141 Idaho 1, 4 , 105 P.3d 267, 271 (2004). 2014When a discharge is based on an employee’s violation of a standard of behavior, “to meet the standard-of-behavior test and prove discharge for misconduct, an employer’s expectations are ordinarily reasonable only where they have been communicated to the employee.” Harris v. Electrical Wholesale, 141 Idaho 1, 4 , 105 P.3d 267, 271 (2004). | 1 | 1 |
Avery v. B & B RENTAL TOILETSgreen2 sentences2011Avery v. B & B Rental Toilets, 97 Idaho 611, 614 , 549 P.2d 270, 273 (1976). 2011Avery v. B & B Rental Toilets, 97 Idaho 611, 614 , 549 P.2d 270, 273 (1976). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Taylor v. Burley Care Center
green
2 sentences1998Taylor, 121 Idaho at 793 , 828 P.2d at 822 . 1998Taylor, 121 Idaho at 793 , 828 P.2d at 822 . | 2 | 1995–1998 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.