Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2012–2022 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Manning v. Department of Employment Securitygreen2 sentences2022Manning v. Department of Employment Security, 365 Ill. 2021Manning v. Department of Employment Security, 365 Ill. | 3 | 3 |
Land v. Board of Educ. of City of Chicagogreen1 sentence2012See Land v. Board of Education, 202 Ill. 2d 414, 426 (2002) (“where the language of a statute is clear and unambiguous, a court must give it effect as written, without reading into it exceptions, limitations, or conditions -4- that the legislature did not express”). ¶ 16 In an appeal involving a claim for unemployment benefits, we defer to the Board’s factual findings unless they are against the manifest weight of the evidence. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Petrovic v. The Department of Employment Security
green
2 sentences2021Matlock, 2019 IL App (1st) 180645, ¶ 22 . ¶ 17 In an appeal involving a claim for unemployment benefits, we review the final decision of the Board (Petrovic v. Department of Employment Security, 2016 IL 118562 , ¶ 22) and defer to the Board’s factual findings unless they are against the manifest weight of the evidence. 2016Thus, we find Williams' due process arguments unavailing. ¶ 51 Having found that Williams' standing and due process challenges lack merit, we thus turn to the merits of the appeal. ¶ 52 "When a party appeals the circuit court's decision on a complaint for administrative review, the appellate court's role is to review the administrative decision rather than the circuit court's decision." Petrovic v. Department of Employment Security, 2014 IL App (1st) 131813 , ¶ 24, rev'd on other grounds, 2016 IL 118562 . " '[T]he findings and conclusions of the administrative agency on questions of fact shall | 2 | 2016–2021 |
Cannici v. Illinois Department of Employment Security Board of Review
green
1 sentence2022Id.; Cannici, 2021 IL App (1st) 181562, ¶ 41 . ¶ 25 In an appeal involving a claim for unemployment benefits, we defer to the Board’s factual findings unless they are against the manifest weight of the evidence. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
The Hope Clinic for Women, Ltd. v. Flores
green
1 sentence2022Hope Clinic for Women, Ltd. v. Flores, 2013 IL 112673, ¶ 47 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Matlock v. Illinois Department of Employment Security
green
1 sentence2021Matlock, 2019 IL App (1st) 180645, ¶ 22 . ¶ 17 In an appeal involving a claim for unemployment benefits, we review the final decision of the Board (Petrovic v. Department of Employment Security, 2016 IL 118562 , ¶ 22) and defer to the Board’s factual findings unless they are against the manifest weight of the evidence. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Woods v. Illinois Department of Employment Security
green
1 sentence2016Thus, we find Williams' due process arguments unavailing. ¶ 51 Having found that Williams' standing and due process challenges lack merit, we thus turn to the merits of the appeal. ¶ 52 "When a party appeals the circuit court's decision on a complaint for administrative review, the appellate court's role is to review the administrative decision rather than the circuit court's decision." Petrovic v. Department of Employment Security, 2014 IL App (1st) 131813 , ¶ 24, rev'd on other grounds, 2016 IL 118562 . " '[T]he findings and conclusions of the administrative agency on questions of fact shall | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Petrovic v. The Department of Employment Security
neutral
1 sentence2016Thus, we find Williams' due process arguments unavailing. ¶ 51 Having found that Williams' standing and due process challenges lack merit, we thus turn to the merits of the appeal. ¶ 52 "When a party appeals the circuit court's decision on a complaint for administrative review, the appellate court's role is to review the administrative decision rather than the circuit court's decision." Petrovic v. Department of Employment Security, 2014 IL App (1st) 131813 , ¶ 24, rev'd on other grounds, 2016 IL 118562 . " '[T]he findings and conclusions of the administrative agency on questions of fact shall | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.