Apprendi-based challenge (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

Apprendi-based challenge in Illinois

5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2003 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Amayagreen
illappct · 2001 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003Citing Billops, the Townsell court held that, because an Apprendi-based claim may be reviewed as plain error following a jury trial (see, e.g., People v. Amaya, 321 Ill.

2003Citing Billops, the Townsell court held that, because an Apprendi-based claim may be reviewed as plain error following a jury trial (see, e.g., People v. Amaya, 321 Ill.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Crespo green
ill · 2003
2 sentences

2003Just five days later, our supreme court issued a supplemental opinion to People v. Crespo, 203 Ill. 2d 335 , 788 N.E.2d 1117 (2001), in which the court employed a plain error analysis in rejecting the defendant’s Apprendi-based challenge to his extended-term sentence.

2003Just five days later, our supreme court issued a supplemental opinion to People v. Crespo, 203 Ill. 2d 335 , 788 N.E.2d 1117 (2001), in which the court employed a plain error analysis in rejecting the defendant’s Apprendi-based challenge to his extended-term sentence.

22003–2003
People v. Beltran green
illappct · 2002
2 sentences

2003In People v. Beltran, 327 Ill.

2003In People v. Beltran, 327 Ill.

12003–2003
People v. Wagener green
ill · 2001
2 sentences

2002People v. Wagener, 196 Ill. 2d 269 , 752 N.E.2d 430 (2001); People v. Carney, 196 Ill. 2d 518 , 752 N.E.2d 1137 (2001).

2002People v. Wagener, 196 Ill. 2d 269 , 752 N.E.2d 430 (2001); People v. Carney, 196 Ill. 2d 518 , 752 N.E.2d 1137 (2001).

12002–2002
People v. Carney green
ill · 2001
2 sentences

2002People v. Wagener, 196 Ill. 2d 269 , 752 N.E.2d 430 (2001); People v. Carney, 196 Ill. 2d 518 , 752 N.E.2d 1137 (2001).

2002People v. Wagener, 196 Ill. 2d 269 , 752 N.E.2d 430 (2001); People v. Carney, 196 Ill. 2d 518 , 752 N.E.2d 1137 (2001).

12002–2002
People v. Dillard green
illappct · 2001
2 sentences

2002We have previously rejected an Apprendi-based challenge to section 5 — 5 — 3.2(b)(1), relying on the analysis in People v. Dillard, 319 Ill.

2002We have previously rejected an Apprendi-based challenge to section 5 — 5 — 3.2(b)(1), relying on the analysis in People v. Dillard, 319 Ill.

12002–2002

Where else courts name it

IL 5 (2002–2003) OR 4 (2002–2024) PA 3 (2007–2016) TN 2 (2005–2005)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check