Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2009–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Hoodgreen2 sentences2011Compare Hood, 213 Ill.2d at 258 , 290 Ill. 2011Compare Hood, 213 Ill.2d at 258 , 290 Ill. | 3 | 3 |
Biehler v. White Metal Rolling & Stamping Corp.green2 sentences2011Compare Hood, 213 Ill. 2d at 258 (noting that the purpose of the criminal discovery rules is to protect the accused against surprise, unfairness, and inadequate preparation), with Biehler v. White Metal Rolling & Stamping Corp., 30 Ill. 2009Compare Hood, 213 Ill. 2d at 258 (noting that the purpose of the criminal discovery rules is to protect the accused against surprise, unfairness, and inadequate preparation), with Biehler v. White Metal Rolling & Stamping Corp., 30 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Hickeygreen1 sentence2024People v. Hickey, 204 Ill. 2d 585, 598 (2001) (“neither the civil nor criminal discovery rules apply to post- conviction proceedings”); see also Ill. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Morgangreen1 sentence2024We are mindful that the correct sanction to be applied for a criminal discovery violation “is left to the trial court’s discretion, and the judgment of the trial judge is given great weight.” People v. Morgan, 112 Ill. 2d 111, 135 (1986). ¶ 71 Before closing, we deny defendant’s request that we remand this case for another hearing regarding the purged videos. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Strobelgreen1 sentence2024First, Rule 417 is a criminal discovery rule (People v. Strobel, 2014 IL App (1st) 130300, ¶ 8 (Illinois Supreme Court Rules 411 through 417 “provide for discovery in criminal cases” and “apply only to cases in which a defendant may be imprisoned for a felony”)), and it does not apply to civil or post-conviction proceedings. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.