Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2000–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Kinney
green
2 sentences2000People v. Kinney , 294 Ill. 2000People v. Kinney, 294 Ill. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
People v. Taliani
green
1 sentence2025Taliani, 2021 IL 125891, ¶ 53 ; 725 ILCS 5/122-3 (West 2022). ¶ 14 Section 122-1(f) of the Act states that: “(f) Only one petition may be filed by a petitioner under this Article without leave of the court. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
People v. Simms
green
1 sentence2024The filing of a successive postconviction petition is “highly disfavored” (People v. Simms, 2018 IL 122378, ¶ 38 ) and allowed only in “very limited circumstances” (People v. Davis, 2014 IL 115595, ¶ 14 ). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Allen
green
1 sentence2024The Act anticipates the filing of only one postconviction petition, and a defendant forfeits any claim not presented in the initial petition. 725 ILCS 5/122-1(f) (West 2016); People v. Allen, 2019 IL App (1st) 162985 , ¶ 29. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Davis
green
1 sentence2024The filing of a successive postconviction petition is “highly disfavored” (People v. Simms, 2018 IL 122378, ¶ 38 ) and allowed only in “very limited circumstances” (People v. Davis, 2014 IL 115595, ¶ 14 ). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Sanders
green
2 sentences2020Our supreme court has “identified two bases upon which the bar against successive petitions will be relaxed.” People v. Sanders, 2016 IL 118123 , ¶ 24, 47 N.E.3d 237 . 2020Our supreme court has “identified two bases upon which the bar against successive petitions will be relaxed.” People v. Sanders, 2016 IL 118123 , ¶ 24, 47 N.E.3d 237 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.