Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Town of Kaneville v. Meredithgreen1 sentence2026See id.; Town of Kaneville v. Meredith, 351 Ill. 620, 625 (1933) (“In order to be hostile and adverse [possession] must be under claim of ownership.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Trotter v. School District 218
green
2 sentences2015See id.; Van Meter, 207 Ill. 2d at 380 ; Trotter, 315 Ill. 2015See id.; Van Meter, 207 Ill. 2d at 380 ; Trotter, 315 Ill. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Van Meter v. Darien Park Dist.
green
2 sentences2015See id.; Van Meter, 207 Ill. 2d at 380 ; Trotter, 315 Ill. 2015See id.; Van Meter, 207 Ill. 2d at 380 ; Trotter, 315 Ill. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Jost v. Bailey
green
2 sentences2015Jost, 286 Ill. 2015Jost, 286 Ill. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Caulkins v. Pritzker
green
1 sentence2025Id. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Parker v. Brown
green
2 sentences1983As to the allegations of unconstitutionality, the defendants asserted that the matter had been previously determined in favor of the enactment in Weisberg v. Taylor (1951), 409 Ill. 384 , 100 N.E.2d 748 , and as to allegations of an antitrust violation, the defendants asserted the defense of State action immunity as established in Parker v. Brown (1943), 317 U.S. 341 , 87 L. 1983As to the allegations of unconstitutionality, the defendants asserted that the matter had been previously determined in favor of the enactment in Weisberg v. Taylor (1951), 409 Ill. 384 , 100 N.E.2d 748 , and as to allegations of an antitrust violation, the defendants asserted the defense of State action immunity as established in Parker v. Brown (1943), 317 U.S. 341 , 87 L. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Weisberg v. Taylor
green
2 sentences1983As to the allegations of unconstitutionality, the defendants asserted that the matter had been previously determined in favor of the enactment in Weisberg v. Taylor (1951), 409 Ill. 384 , 100 N.E.2d 748 , and as to allegations of an antitrust violation, the defendants asserted the defense of State action immunity as established in Parker v. Brown (1943), 317 U.S. 341 , 87 L. 1983As to the allegations of unconstitutionality, the defendants asserted that the matter had been previously determined in favor of the enactment in Weisberg v. Taylor (1951), 409 Ill. 384 , 100 N.E.2d 748 , and as to allegations of an antitrust violation, the defendants asserted the defense of State action immunity as established in Parker v. Brown (1943), 317 U.S. 341 , 87 L. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.