Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Cranegreen1 sentence2020See People v. Crane, 195 Ill. 2d 42, 48 (2001) (citing Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530 (1972)) - 13 - 2020 IL App (2d) 180066-U (the factors to be considered in a constitutional speedy-trial claim include length of the delay; reasons for the delay; prejudice, if any, accruing to the defendant; and defendant’s assertion of the speedy-trial right). | 1 | 1 |
Barker v. Wingogreen1 sentence2020See People v. Crane, 195 Ill. 2d 42, 48 (2001) (citing Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530 (1972)) - 13 - 2020 IL App (2d) 180066-U (the factors to be considered in a constitutional speedy-trial claim include length of the delay; reasons for the delay; prejudice, if any, accruing to the defendant; and defendant’s assertion of the speedy-trial right). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Statengreen1 sentence2019See People v. Staten, 159 Ill. 2d 419, 426-27 (1994). ¶ 84 Because defendant has not shown that his statutory speedy-trial claim was preserved, we review his claim for plain error. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Lemons
green
2 sentences2001This conclusion follows from the requirement, as stated in Lemons , that the facts alleged must be such that the "trial court could find a valid claim of deprivation of a constitutional right." Lemons, 242 Ill.App.3d at 946 , 184 Ill.Dec. 642 , 613 N.E.2d 1234 . 2001This conclusion follows from the requirement, as stated in Lemons, that the facts alleged must be such that the “trial court could find a valid claim of deprivation of a constitutional right.” Lemons, 242 Ill. | 2 | 2001–2001 |
People v. Gaultney
green
2 sentences2001Necessarily, if facts supporting all the elements of a constitutional claim are not included in the petition, the circuit court could not "find a valid claim." However, requiring this type of full or complete pleading is contrary to this court's holding that the pro se defendant "need only present a limited amount of detail" ( Gaultney, 174 Ill.2d at 418 , 221 Ill.Dec. 195 , 675 N.E.2d 102 ) to survive summary dismissal at the first stage of the post-conviction proceedings. 2001Necessarily, if facts supporting all the elements of a constitutional claim are not included in the petition, the circuit court could not “find a valid claim.” However, requiring this type of full or complete pleading is contrary to this court’s holding that the pro se defendant “need only present a limited amount of detail” (Gaultney, 174 Ill. 2d at 418 ) to survive summary dismissal at the first stage of the post-conviction proceedings. | 2 | 2001–2001 |
People v. White
green
1 sentence2023People v. White, 2014 IL App (1st) 130007, ¶ 19 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.