Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1941–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Walker v. Midwest Emery Freight System, Inc.green1 sentence2013See Walker v. Midwest Emery Freight Systems, Inc., 200 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Harrisgreen1 sentence2013After announcing the general rule that such statements amount to improper bolstering of a witness’s testimony, this court recognized the recent fabrication exception, citing People v. Harris, 123 Ill. 2d 113, 139-40 (1988). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Lylesgreen2 sentences1993(See People v. Lyles, 106 Ill. 2d at 390-91 (prosecutor’s statement that defense counsel would go to any length including misstating the law and confusing the jury in order to free defendant was not improper where such comment was invited by defense counsel’s argument).) We further note that here too the prosecutor’s remarks do not allege any trickery on the part of defense counsel (People v. Lyles, 106 Ill. 2d at 391 ), assail defense counsel’s character (People v. Kirk (1966), 36 Ill. 2d 292 , 222 N.E.2d 498 ), or suggest the fabrication of a defense. 1993(See People v. Lyles, 106 Ill. 2d at 390-91 (prosecutor’s statement that defense counsel would go to any length including misstating the law and confusing the jury in order to free defendant was not improper where such comment was invited by defense counsel’s argument).) We further note that here too the prosecutor’s remarks do not allege any trickery on the part of defense counsel (People v. Lyles, 106 Ill. 2d at 391 ), assail defense counsel’s character (People v. Kirk (1966), 36 Ill. 2d 292 , 222 N.E.2d 498 ), or suggest the fabrication of a defense. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Bobiek
green
1 sentence1999People v. Bobiek, 271 Ill. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
The PEOPLE v. Kirk
green
2 sentences1993(See People v. Lyles, 106 Ill. 2d at 390-91 (prosecutor’s statement that defense counsel would go to any length including misstating the law and confusing the jury in order to free defendant was not improper where such comment was invited by defense counsel’s argument).) We further note that here too the prosecutor’s remarks do not allege any trickery on the part of defense counsel (People v. Lyles, 106 Ill. 2d at 391 ), assail defense counsel’s character (People v. Kirk (1966), 36 Ill. 2d 292 , 222 N.E.2d 498 ), or suggest the fabrication of a defense. 1993(See People v. Lyles, 106 Ill. 2d at 390-91 (prosecutor’s statement that defense counsel would go to any length including misstating the law and confusing the jury in order to free defendant was not improper where such comment was invited by defense counsel’s argument).) We further note that here too the prosecutor’s remarks do not allege any trickery on the part of defense counsel (People v. Lyles, 106 Ill. 2d at 391 ), assail defense counsel’s character (People v. Kirk (1966), 36 Ill. 2d 292 , 222 N.E.2d 498 ), or suggest the fabrication of a defense. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
People v. Manley
neutral
1 sentence1993App. 3d 478 , 432 N.E.2d 1103 .) In the instant case, the circuit court overruled defendant’s objection to the use of the police* report based on the recent fabrication exception to hearsay. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
People v. Rodriguez
green
1 sentence1993(People v. Rodriguez (1992), 236 Ill. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Byrd v. State
green
1 sentence1941But the conspiracy may continue for various purposes, as, for instance, the securing of the proceeds of the crime . . . the division of such proceeds, the concealment of the crime, effecting an escape, the concealment of evidence tending to incriminate the conspirators, procuring witnesses to leave the State, bribing witnesses, influencing witnesses with respect to their testimony, the fabrication of evidence tending to exculpate the conspirators, the fabrication of a defense, or in any way avoiding prosecution or punishment; and where this is the case the acts and declarations of one conspira | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.