generally accepted medical standard (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

generally accepted medical standard in Illinois

5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1985–2009 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Chamness v. Odumgreen
illappct · 1979 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1985–1985
1 sentence

1985App. 3d 98, 107 , 399 N.E.2d 238, 246 (all that is necessary for expert to establish is that there was a generally accepted medical standard of care or skill which entailed treatment or performance of a procedure in a manner different than that provided by defendant).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Walski v. Tiesenga green
ill · 1978
2 sentences

2009The plaintiff's expert "at no time testified that there was a generally accepted medical standard of care or skill which required the [medical procedure] under the circumstances. * * * Absent is any statement of a standard [the defendant doctor] was required to follow in this case." Walski, 72 Ill.2d at 259-60 , 21 Ill. *1035 Dec. 201, 381 N.E.2d 279 .

2009The plaintiffs expert “at no time testified that there was a generally accepted medical standard of care or skill which required the [medical procedure] under the circumstances. *** Absent is any statement of a standard [the defendant doctor] was required to follow in this case.” Walski, 72 Ill. 2d at 259-60 .

41988–2009

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check