Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1985–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ittersagen v. Advocate Health and Hospitals Corp.green1 sentence2023See Wauconda Fire Protection District v. Stonewall Orchards, LLP, 214 Ill. 2d 417, 428 (2005) (the Illinois Supreme Court Rules must be strictly observed in the circuit and appellate courts); Ittersagen v. Advocate Health & Hospitals Corp., 2021 IL 126507, ¶ 37 (“the Illinois Supreme Court rules are not suggestions; they have the force of law and must be followed.”). ¶ 19 Further, the court’s order of September 20 allowed Speedway to file its Objections to Illinois Bell’s motion to supplement the record while only taking Speedway’s motion to vacate the September 16 order with the case. | 1 | 1 |
Wauconda Fire Protection District v. Stonewall Orchards, LLPgreen1 sentence2023See Wauconda Fire Protection District v. Stonewall Orchards, LLP, 214 Ill. 2d 417, 428 (2005) (the Illinois Supreme Court Rules must be strictly observed in the circuit and appellate courts); Ittersagen v. Advocate Health & Hospitals Corp., 2021 IL 126507, ¶ 37 (“the Illinois Supreme Court rules are not suggestions; they have the force of law and must be followed.”). ¶ 19 Further, the court’s order of September 20 allowed Speedway to file its Objections to Illinois Bell’s motion to supplement the record while only taking Speedway’s motion to vacate the September 16 order with the case. | 1 | 1 |
Warren County Soil and Water Conservation District v. Waltersgreen1 sentence2023See Warren County Soil & Water Conservation District v. Walters, 2015 IL 117783, ¶ 51 (abuse of discretion standard applies to the circuit court’s decision on a fact- dependent challenge to a final judgment brought under section 2-1401). ¶ 21 We note that the materials added to the record on appeal by Illinois Bell’s motion to supplement are different. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People Ex Rel. Madigan v. Illinois Commerce Commission
green
2 sentences2010Madigan, 394 Ill. 2010Madigan, 394 Ill. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Dixon v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.
green
1 sentence2023Citing Dixon v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co., 151 Ill. 2d 108 (1992), Illinois Bell contended that the settlement between Speedway and Rice mooted this appeal by operation of the Contribution Act (740 ILCS 100/1 et seq. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Washington v. Board of Review
green
1 sentence1995App. 3d 663, 668 , 570 N.E.2d 566, 570 .) Based on the facts contained in the record, the Board could conclude that the claimant’s act of disregarding Illinois Bell’s rule was willful. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Mandel Bros. Inc. v. Chicago Tunnel Terminal Co.
green
2 sentences1985It argues that while Mandel Brothers, Inc. v. Chicago Tunnel Terminal Co. (1954), 2 Ill. 2d 205 , 117 N.E.2d 774 , prohibits statutory reparations in this case, it does not prohibit restitution under equitable principles. 1985It argues that while Mandel Brothers, Inc. v. Chicago Tunnel Terminal Co. (1954), 2 Ill. 2d 205 , 117 N.E.2d 774 , prohibits statutory reparations in this case, it does not prohibit restitution under equitable principles. | 1 | 1985–1985 |