Insureds claim (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

Insureds claim in Illinois

5 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2022 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Old Mutual Casualty Company v. Clark green
illappct · 1977
2 sentences

2022Old Mutual Casualty Co., 53 Ill.

2022Old Mutual Casualty Co., 53 Ill.

22021–2022
Baxter International, Inc. v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance green
illappct · 2006
2 sentences

2022It argued the Insureds’ claim should be dismissed under section 2-615 of the Code because they “failed to identify any factual allegations to support a claim that Farmers acted vexatiously or unreasonably.” Farmers further argued the counterclaim should be dismissed under section 2-619 of the Code because “[n]o claim for violation of Section 155 will lie where there is a bona fide dispute concerning the scope and application of insurance coverage” (citing Baxter, 369 Ill.

2021It argued the Insureds’ claim should be dismissed under section 2-615 of the Code because they “failed to identify any factual allegations to support a claim that Farmers acted vexatiously or unreasonably.” Farmers further argued the counterclaim should be dismissed under section 2-619 of the Code because “[n]o claim for violation of Section 155 will lie where there is a bona fide dispute concerning the scope and application of insurance coverage” (citing Baxter, 369 Ill.

22021–2022
Walbrook Ins. Co. Ltd. v. Goshgarian & Goshgarian green
cacd · 1989
2 sentences

2005Walbrook , 726 F. Supp. at 782 .

2005Walbrook, 726 F. Supp. at 782 .

22005–2005
Waste Management, Inc. v. International Surplus Lines Insurance green
ill · 1991
1 sentence

2007However, the duty to indemnify was subject to certain exclusions and conditions, including the insureds’ “duty to cooperate.” The “duty to cooperate” was memorialized in the policies as a “cooperation clause,” which imposed upon the insureds “the duty to assist [the] insurers in the conduct of suits and in enforcing any right to contribution or indemnity against persons potentially liable to [the] insureds.” Waste Management, 144 Ill. 2d at 192 .

12007–2007

Where else courts name it

PA 5 (2015–2024) IL 5 (2005–2022) CA 4 (1994–2021) MS 4 (1998–2013) FL 2 (2001–2017) OR 2 (2007–2024) MO 2 (1984–2014) TX 2 (1985–2009)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check