Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2000–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lieber v. Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois Universitygreen1 sentence2022See Lieber, 176 Ill. 2d at 408-09 ; McGee, 2017 IL App (3d) 160324 , ¶ 17. | 1 | 1 |
Stephens v. Taylorgreen2 sentences2022See Stephens v. Taylor, 207 Ill. 2d 216, 222 (2003) (recognizing the well-settled legal principle under Illinois law that a party cannot claim error on appeal when it induced the trial court’s mistake). 2022See Stephens v. Taylor, 207 Ill. 2d 216, 222 (2003) (recognizing the well-settled legal principle under Illinois law that a party cannot claim error on appeal when it induced the trial court’s mistake). | 1 | 1 |
Student Press Law Center v. Alexandergreen2 sentences2013Whether the Educational Privacy Act Prevents Disclosure of Records Under FOIA -14- ¶ 69 Having concluded that all but three documents are exempt from disclosure under section 7(1)(c) or 7(1)(f) of FOIA, we now turn to the three remaining documents, which consist of (1) the “internal communication re: personnel matter” (Bates No. 55), (2) the e-mailed student complaint (Bates No. 51-52), and (3) coaches’ witness statements (Bates Nos. 24-25) to determine whether the Educational Privacy Act requires exemption of those documents. ¶ 70 The purpose of the Educational Privacy Act is to “ensure acces 2013Whether the Educational Privacy Act Prevents Disclosure of Records Under FOIA -14- ¶ 69 Having concluded that all but three documents are exempt from disclosure under section 7(1)(c) or 7(1)(f) of FOIA, we now turn to the three remaining documents, which consist of (1) the “internal communication re: personnel matter” (Bates No. 55), (2) the e-mailed student complaint (Bates No. 51-52), and (3) coaches’ witness statements (Bates Nos. 24-25) to determine whether the Educational Privacy Act requires exemption of those documents. ¶ 70 The purpose of the Educational Privacy Act is to “ensure acces | 1 | 1 |
Chicago Tribune Co. v. Board of Educationgreen1 sentence2004See Chicago Tribune, 332 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lieber v. Southern Illinois University
green
2 sentences2000Lieber v. Southern Illinois University , 279 Ill. 2000Lieber v. Southern Illinois University, 279 Ill. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
McGee v. Kelley
green
1 sentence2022See Lieber, 176 Ill. 2d at 408-09 ; McGee, 2017 IL App (3d) 160324 , ¶ 17. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.