mutuality of obligation means that unless doctrine (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

mutuality of obligation means that unless doctrine in Illinois

5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1984–2011 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Kraftco Corp. v. Koblusgreen
illappct · 1971 · cited in 3 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1984–2004
2 sentences

2004See Kraftco Corp. v. Kolbus , 1 Ill.

2004See Kraftco Corp. v. Kolbus, 1 Ill.

23
Schwinder v. Austin Bank of Chicagogreen
illappct · 2004 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011In the present case, the plaintiff maintains that the arbitration agreements are void and are not enforceable due to a lack of mutuality. ¶ 25 "In its most elemental sense, the doctrine of mutuality of obligation means that unless both parties to a contract are bound by its terms, neither is bound." Schwinder v. Austin Bank of Chicago, 348 Ill.App.3d 461, 473 , 284 Ill.

2011In the present case, the plaintiff maintains that the arbitration agreements are void and are not enforceable due to a lack of mutuality. ¶ 25 "In its most elemental sense, the doctrine of mutuality of obligation means that unless both parties to a contract are bound by its terms, neither is bound." Schwinder v. Austin Bank of Chicago, 348 Ill.App.3d 461, 473 , 284 Ill.

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check