person having claim (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

person having claim in Illinois

5 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1900–1951 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Furst v. Brady green
ill · 1940
2 sentences

1951Furst v. Brady, supra, and In re Estate of Mahan, supra. Whether the appellant could collect anything from the insurance policy in the present case, or anything from the estate aside from the $81, in the event he procured a judgment against the Estate of George E.

1947In the case of Furst v. Brady, 375 Ill. 425 , cited by plaintiffs, the court held that the word ‘1 creditors ’ ’ in the 9th clause of sec. 18 of our Administration Act, includes a person having a claim for personal injuries against the deceased due to his negligence.

21947–1951
Boone v. Robert green
ill · 1889
2 sentences

1937(Boone v. Clark, 129 Ill. 466 ; Iglehart v. Crane & Wesson, 42 id. 261.)” (Beckman v. Alberts, 346 Ill. 74, 78 .) Appellant contends that that doctrine has no application to the facts.

1931(Boone v. Clark, 129 Ill. 466 ; Iglehart v. Crane & Wesson, 42 id. 261.) In this case plaintiff in error had a lien on the hogs, on the 1925 com crop and on other personal property.

21931–1937
Gulf Transport Co. v. Mahan neutral
illappct · 1950
1 sentence

1951Furst v. Brady, supra, and In re Estate of Mahan, supra. Whether the appellant could collect anything from the insurance policy in the present case, or anything from the estate aside from the $81, in the event he procured a judgment against the Estate of George E.

11951–1951
Beckman v. Alberts neutral
ill · 1931
1 sentence

1937(Boone v. Clark, 129 Ill. 466 ; Iglehart v. Crane & Wesson, 42 id. 261.)” (Beckman v. Alberts, 346 Ill. 74, 78 .) Appellant contends that that doctrine has no application to the facts.

11937–1937
Bongard v. Block green
ill · 1876
1 sentence

1900Bougard v. Block, 81 Ill. 186 ; Anglo-American Co. v. Baier, 31 Ill.

11900–1900
Anglo-American Packing & Provision Co. v. Baier neutral
illappct · 1889
1 sentence

1900Bougard v. Block, 81 Ill. 186 ; Anglo-American Co. v. Baier, 31 Ill.

11900–1900

Where else courts name it

CA 6 (1896–1952) NY 6 (1913–2024) IN 6 (2003–2026) IL 5 (1900–1951) TX 5 (1952–2024) CT 3 (1955–1995) WA 3 (1949–2015) MI 2 (1925–1988) VT 2 (1895–2024) NE 2 (1971–1979) MA 2 (1934–1938) OK 2 (1923–1986) PA 2 (2004–2007)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check