set-off clause (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

set-off clause in Illinois

5 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1884–1997 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Illinois Farmers Insurance v. Taborgreen
illappct · 1994 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
2 sentences

1997The set-off clause mandating the reduction of UIM payments by the amounts received from the tort-feasor operates only if the tort-feasor's vehicle is classified as underinsured." Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Tabor, 267 Ill.App.3d 245, 250 , 204 Ill.Dec. 697 , 642 N.E.2d 159 (1994).

1997The set-off clause mandating the reduction of UIM payments by the amounts received from the tort-feasor operates only if the tort-feasor’s vehicle is classified as underinsured.” Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Tabor, 267 Ill.

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Heiple v. Lehman neutral
ill · 1934
1 sentence

1935Mutuality exists as between the appellant and Lydia King, and where the plaintiff is an insolvent, unusual and extraordinary conditions arise, and public justice demands that such defendant, being severally liable, should be protected in her right of set-off.” A further appeal having been taken to the Supreme Court, the judgment of the Appellate Court was affirmed in Heiple v. Lehman, 358 Ill. 222 .

11935–1935
Pritchard v. Norton green
· 1882
2 sentences

1923The principal cases cited and relied on are: Pritchard v. Norton, 106 U. S. 124 , 27 L.

1923The principal cases cited and relied on are: Pritchard v. Norton, 106 U. S. 124 , 27 L.

11923–1923
Howell v. Goodrich green
ill · 1873
2 sentences

1884Howell v. Goodrich, 69 Ill. 556 ; Hanna v. Reid, 102 Id. 596 .

1884Howell v. Goodrich, 69 Ill. 556 ; Hanna v. Reid, 102 Id. 596 .

11884–1884

Where else courts name it

PA 11 (1900–2011) NY 11 (1875–1994) MO 10 (1927–2015) AL 7 (1845–2001) IN 7 (1864–2019) GA 6 (1974–2015) NE 5 (1893–1934) IL 5 (1884–1997) MI 5 (1915–1988) CT 4 (1988–1996) CO 4 (1907–2001) NC 4 (1874–2005) WA 3 (1957–1990) DE 3 (1964–2009) OK 3 (1937–2000) VT 2 (2024–2024) TN 2 (1903–2016) AZ 2 (1985–1990) TX 2 (1939–1995) MA 2 (1913–2001) MD 2 (1991–2011) IA 2 (1862–1984) FL 2 (1987–2000) SC 2 (1942–1942) OH 2 (1914–2004)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check