Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2020–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Smithgreen1 sentence2025See People v. Smith, 259 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Moore
green
2 sentences2021We disagree with this proposition. ¶ 49 In support of his argument, defendant relies on the oft-cited passage from Moore, 207 Ill. 2d at 77 -78: “[W]hen a defendant presents a pro se posttrial claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the trial court should first examine the factual basis of the defendant’s claim. 2020We disagree with this proposition. ¶ 49 In support of his argument, defendant relies on the oft-cited passage from Moore, 207 Ill. 2d at 77 -78: “[W]hen a defendant presents a pro se posttrial claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the trial court should first examine the factual basis of the defendant’s claim. | 3 | 2020–2021 |
People v. Winston
green
1 sentence2022Defendant testified that his plea was involuntary because plea counsel “led [defendant] to believe that [case No. 18-CF- 53] as well as Ogle County were going to be dropped.” Defendant testified that no promises were made to him when he pleaded guilty, “aside from [plea counsel] telling [him] that Ogle and [case No. 18-CF-53] would be abolished.” The trial court rejected defendant’s argument, based on defendant’s assurances at the plea hearing. ¶ 34 Defendant’s reliance on People v. Winston, 2020 IL App (2d) 180289 , does not warrant a different conclusion, as it is readily distinguishable. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.