Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2011–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jackson v. Randlegreen2 sentences2020Id. ¶ 15 “[T]he doctrine of standing is designed to ‘preclude persons who have no interest in a controversy from bringing suit.’ ” Jackson v. Randle, 2011 IL App (4th) 100790, ¶ 14 (quoting Glisson, 188 Ill. 2d at 221 ). 2015“Generally, the doctrine of standing is designed to ‘preclude persons who have no interest in a controversy from bringing suit.’ ” Jackson v. Randle, 2011 IL App (4th) 100790, ¶ 14 (quoting Glisson v. City of Marion, 188 Ill. 2d 211, 221 (1999)). ¶ 22 As the State points out, both in its motion to dismiss and on appeal, the Jackson court recently decided this exact issue. | 3 | 3 |
Glisson v. City of Mariongreen2 sentences2020Id. ¶ 15 “[T]he doctrine of standing is designed to ‘preclude persons who have no interest in a controversy from bringing suit.’ ” Jackson v. Randle, 2011 IL App (4th) 100790, ¶ 14 (quoting Glisson, 188 Ill. 2d at 221 ). 2020Id. ¶ 15 “[T]he doctrine of standing is designed to ‘preclude persons who have no interest in a controversy from bringing suit.’ ” Jackson v. Randle, 2011 IL App (4th) 100790, ¶ 14 (quoting Glisson, 188 Ill. 2d at 221 ). | 2 | 5 |
Jenner v. Wissoregreen1 sentence2020Under the doctrine, a plaintiff seeking to invoke the jurisdiction of 4 the court “must have some real interest in the cause of action, or a legal or equitable right, title or interest in the subject matter of the controversy.” Jenner v. Wissore, 164 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.