State to disclose defense (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

State to disclose defense in Illinois

5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1990–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Sanchezgreen
illappct · 2009 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
2 sentences

2017People v. Sanchez, 388 Ill.

2017People v. Sanchez, 388 Ill.

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Preatty green
illappct · 1994
1 sentence

1995(People v. Preatty (1994), 256 Ill.

11995–1995
People v. Ward green
ill · 1992
1 sentence

1994Ed. 2d 215 , 83 S. Ct. 1194 ; People v. Ward (1992), 154 Ill. 2d 272, 297-98 .) A violation of this rule does not require a new trial unless the defendant demonstrates that the undisclosed information was "material,” i.e., there is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome such that, had the information been disclosed, the verdict would have been different.

11994–1994
Brady v. Maryland green
scotus · 1963
2 sentences

1994Both due process and Illinois Supreme Court Rule 412(c) obligate the State to disclose to defense counsel any material or information within its possession or control which tends to negate the guilt of the accused as to the offense charged. (134 Ill. 2d R. 412(c); Brady v. Maryland (1963), 373 U.S. 83 , 10 L.

1994Both due process and Illinois Supreme Court Rule 412(c) obligate the State to disclose to defense counsel any material or information within its possession or control which tends to negate the guilt of the accused as to the offense charged. (134 Ill. 2d R. 412(c); Brady v. Maryland (1963), 373 U.S. 83 , 10 L.

11994–1994
People v. Flowers neutral
ill · 1972
2 sentences

1990People v. Flowers (1972), 51 Ill. 2d 25 , 281 N.E.2d 299 , upon which defendant relies, requires the State to disclose to defense counsel all relevant, nonprivileged, pretrial reports or statements of prosecution witnesses.

1990People v. Flowers (1972), 51 Ill. 2d 25 , 281 N.E.2d 299 , upon which defendant relies, requires the State to disclose to defense counsel all relevant, nonprivileged, pretrial reports or statements of prosecution witnesses.

11990–1990

Where else courts name it

AR 5 (1981–2020) IL 5 (1990–2017) MD 2 (1987–1992)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check