Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1994–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Heardgreen2 sentences2000People v. Heard, 187 Ill. 2d 36, 80 , 718 N.E.2d 58, 82 (1999). 2000People v. Heard, 187 Ill. 2d 36, 80 , 718 N.E.2d 58, 82 (1999). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Rowell
green
1 sentence2022Id. ¶ 115 In conducting that analysis, this court may consider information in a PSI “for the limited purpose of speculating about what additional evidence the State might have presented if defendant had filed a motion to suppress.” Id. ¶ 34. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Toolate
green
1 sentence1995This court is aware that in the recent opinion of People v. Toolate (4th Dist. 1995), 274 Ill. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Malatesta v. Leichter
green
1 sentence1994On point is Malatesta v. Leichter (1989), 186 Ill. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.