7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 24 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wright Ex Rel. Hood v. Bradley.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wright Ex Rel. Hood v. Bradley Anchor | green | “issues of statutory interpretation are subject to de novo review.” | 6 |
| 2 | Stockwell v. DISTRICT COURT OF VERMONT | green | “showed not the slightest indication that he was giving any serious consideration to the request made of him several times.” | 3 |
| 3 | Stockwell v. DISTRICT COURT OF VERMONT | green | “uncooperative from the outset and never changed.” | 3 |
| 4 | Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. Goodman | green | “subsequent testing cannot cure a violation of the statute, if it could, then delays in testing would increase so bloodstream alcohol levels could deteriorate, and accurate evidence samples could no longer be obtained.” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Benware | green | “a reasonable amount of time to decide whether to submit to the breath test, but no longer than thirty minutes after the first attempt to contact an attorney,” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. Benware | green | “deliberated beyond the thirty-minute statutory time limit imposed by 23 v.s.a. 1202(c),” | 3 |
| 7 | State v. Benware | green | “five attempts to administer the test over a period of forty-one minutes.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.