4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from ESB BANK v. McDade.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ESB BANK v. McDade Anchor | green | “the record must be sufficient to sustain the judgment.” | 7 |
| 2 | Dollar Bank v. Northwood Cheese Co. | green | “made in rigid adherence to the provisions of the warrant of attorney; otherwise, such judgment will be stricken.” | 5 |
| 3 | Resolution Trust Corp. v. Copley Qu-Wayne Associates | green | “if the truth of the factual averments contained in the complaint in confession of judgment and attached exhibits are disputed, then the remedy is by proceeding to open the judgment,” | 5 |
| 4 | Scott Factors, Inc. v. Hartley | green | “a warrant of attorney is a contractual agreement between the parties and the parties are free to determine the manner in which the warrant may be exercised.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.