4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Louis F. Peick v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Louis F. Peick v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation Anchor | green | “the court's method of analysis in turner elkhorn mining represents a fundamental shift from that employed in alton railroad.” | 3 |
| 2 | Chew v. Quesada | green | “the evidence is overwhelming that alton is no longer controlling law.” | 3 |
| 3 | Marroquin-Manriguez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service | green | “the court's method of analysis in turner elkhorn mining represents a fundamental shift from that employed in alton railroad.” | 3 |
| 4 | Miner v. Brackney | green | “the court's method of analysis in turner elkhorn mining represents a fundamental shift from that employed in alton railroad.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.