4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Murdock.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Murdock Anchor | green | “proof of an essential element of the offense is lacking in this case” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Black | green | “a defendant may be seen as possessing a degree of knowledge or sophistication that excuses the lack of admonition.” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Bahrs | green | “a high degree of legal sophistication” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. LeFlore | green | “failed to see compliance of any sort” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.