5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re Za. G..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re Za. G. Anchor | green | “if the opposite conclusion is apparent or when findings appear to be unreasonable, arbitrary, or not based on the evidence presented.” | 18 |
| 2 | In re P.S. | green | “whether the parent has made earnest and conscientious strides toward correcting the conditions that led to the removal of the minor from the home.” | 9 |
| 3 | In re D.T. | green | “the benchmark for measuring a parent's reasonable progress under section 1(d)(m) of the adoption act encompasses the parent's compliance with the service plans and court's directives in light of the condition that gave rise to the removal of the child and other conditions which …” | 5 |
| 4 | In re Za. G. | green | “focus is on the parent's reasonable efforts more so than the parent's success.” | 5 |
| 5 | In re P.S. | green | “a subjective standard and refers to the amount of effort reasonable for the particular parent.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.