C.F.R. » Title 10 » CHAPTER I—NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION › PART 2—AGENCY RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE › Subpart A—Procedure for Issuance, Amendment, Transfer, or Renewal of a License, and Standard Design Approval

10 C.F.R. § 2.102

Administrative review of application

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) During review of an application by the NRC staff, an applicant may be required to supply additional information. The staff may request any one party to the proceeding to confer with the NRC staff informally. In the case of docketed application for a limited work authorization, construction permit, operating license, early site permit, standard design approval, combined license, or manufacturing license under this chapter, the NRC staff shall establish a schedule for its review of the application, specifying the key intermediate steps from the time of docketing until the completion of its review.

(b) The Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, or Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, as appropriate, will refer the docketed application to the ACRS as required by law and in such additional cases as the Director or the Commission may determine to be appropriate. The ACRS will render to the Commission one or more reports as required by law or as requested by the Commission.

(c) The Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, or Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, as appropriate, will make each report of the ACRS a part of the record of the docketed application, and transmit copies to the appropriate State and local officials.

[27 FR 377, Jan. 13, 1962, as amended at 36 FR 13270, July 17, 1971; 37 FR 15130, July 28, 1972; 47 FR 9986, Mar. 9, 1982; 69 FR 2235, Jan. 14, 2004; 70 FR 61887, Oct. 27, 2005; 72 FR 49472, Aug. 28, 2007; 72 FR 57439, Oct. 9, 2007; 73 FR 5715, Jan. 31, 2008; 84 FR 65643, Nov. 29, 2019; 88 FR 57876, Aug. 24, 2023]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1974–1983 · leading case: Union of Concerned Scientists v. Atomic Energy Comm'n & United States of Am., Boston Edison Co., Intervenor, 499 F.2d 1069 (D.C. Cir. 1974).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Union of Concerned Scientists v. Atomic Energy Comm'n & United States of Am., Boston Edison Co., Intervenor, 499 F.2d 1069 (D.C. Cir. 1974). “§ 2232 (b) and 10 C.F.R. § 2.102 (c). 7 . 36 F.R. 13287 (July 17, 1971).”
City of West Chicago v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 701 F.2d 632 (7th Cir. 1983). “10 C.F.R. §§ 2.102 , 2.708, 21 Fed.Reg. 804 (Feb.”
Concerned Citizens v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 430 F. Supp. 627 (D.R.I. 1977). “NRC regulations explicitly permit docketing an application prior to its completion of environmental data, 10 CFR § 2.”
Porter Cnty. Chapter of the Izaak Walton League of Am., Inc. v. Atomic Energy Comm'n, 515 F.2d 513 (7th Cir. 1975). “§ 2232 (b) and 10 C.F.R. § 2.102 (c) and the AEC staff through DRL filed its Safety Evaluation Report (SER) on February 15, 1972.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.