10 C.F.R. § 71.2

Interpretations

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Except as specifically authorized by the Commission in writing, no interpretation of the meaning of the regulations in this part by any officer or employee of the Commission, other than a written interpretation by the General Counsel, will be recognized to be binding upon the Commission. This section shall cease to have effect on January 8, 2027, unless the NRC determines that the cessation deadline should be extended to a date not more than 5 years in the future after offering the public an opportunity to provide input on the costs and benefits of this section and considering that input. The NRC will publish a document in the Federal Register announcing its determination and revising or removing this section accordingly.

[69 FR 3786, Jan. 26, 2004, as amended at 90 FR 55632, Dec. 3, 2025]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1984–1984 · leading case: People v. Aguilar, 677 P.2d 1198 (Cal. 1984).
People v. Aguilar, 677 P.2d 1198 (Cal. 1984). · cites it 2× “Although the ability to speak and understand English was a requirement for voluntary enlistment in 1938 ( 10 C.F.R. § 71.2 , subd. (b) (1938 ed.)), that requirement was eliminated in 1939 and was not reinstated during the time that Mata Aguilar was in the Army.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.