12 C.F.R. § 1022.43

Direct disputes

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) General rule. Except as otherwise provided in this section, a furnisher must conduct a reasonable investigation of a direct dispute if it relates to:

(1) The consumer's liability for a credit account or other debt with the furnisher, such as direct disputes relating to whether there is or has been identity theft or fraud against the consumer, whether there is individual or joint liability on an account, or whether the consumer is an authorized user of a credit account;

(2) The terms of a credit account or other debt with the furnisher, such as direct disputes relating to the type of account, principal balance, scheduled payment amount on an account, or the amount of the credit limit on an open-end account;

(3) The consumer's performance or other conduct concerning an account or other relationship with the furnisher, such as direct disputes relating to the current payment status, high balance, date a payment was made, the amount of a payment made, or the date an account was opened or closed; or

(4) Any other information contained in a consumer report regarding an account or other relationship with the furnisher that bears on the consumer's creditworthiness, credit standing, credit capacity, character, general reputation, personal characteristics, or mode of living.

(b) Exceptions. The requirements of paragraph (a) of this section do not apply to a furnisher if:

(1) The direct dispute relates to:

(i) The consumer's identifying information (other than a direct dispute relating to a consumer's liability for a credit account or other debt with the furnisher, as provided in paragraph (a)(1) of this section) such as name(s), date of birth, Social Security number, telephone number(s), or address(es);

(ii) The identity of past or present employers;

(iii) Inquiries or requests for a consumer report;

(iv) Information derived from public records, such as judgments, bankruptcies, liens, and other legal matters (unless provided by a furnisher with an account or other relationship with the consumer);

(v) Information related to fraud alerts or active duty alerts; or

(vi) Information provided to a consumer reporting agency by another furnisher; or

(2) The furnisher has a reasonable belief that the direct dispute is submitted by, is prepared on behalf of the consumer by, or is submitted on a form supplied to the consumer by, a credit repair organization, as defined in 15 U.S.C. 1679a(3), or an entity that would be a credit repair organization, but for 15 U.S.C. 1679a(3)(B)(i).

(c) Direct dispute address. A furnisher is required to investigate a direct dispute only if a consumer submits a dispute notice to the furnisher at:

(1) The address of a furnisher provided by a furnisher and set forth on a consumer report relating to the consumer;

(2) An address clearly and conspicuously specified by the furnisher for submitting direct disputes that is provided to the consumer in writing or electronically (if the consumer has agreed to the electronic delivery of information from the furnisher); or

(3) Any business address of the furnisher if the furnisher has not so specified and provided an address for submitting direct disputes under paragraphs (c)(1) or (2) of this section.

(d) Direct dispute notice contents. A dispute notice must include:

(1) Sufficient information to identify the account or other relationship that is in dispute, such as an account number and the name, address, and telephone number of the consumer, if applicable;

(2) The specific information that the consumer is disputing and an explanation of the basis for the dispute; and

(3) All supporting documentation or other information reasonably required by the furnisher to substantiate the basis of the dispute. This documentation may include, for example: a copy of the relevant portion of the consumer report that contains the allegedly inaccurate information; a police report; a fraud or identity theft affidavit; a court order; or account statements.

(e) Duty of furnisher after receiving a direct dispute notice. After receiving a dispute notice from a consumer pursuant to paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, the furnisher must:

(1) Conduct a reasonable investigation with respect to the disputed information;

(2) Review all relevant information provided by the consumer with the dispute notice;

(3) Complete its investigation of the dispute and report the results of the investigation to the consumer before the expiration of the period under section 611(a)(1) of the FCRA (15 U.S.C. 1681i(a)(1)) within which a consumer reporting agency would be required to complete its action if the consumer had elected to dispute the information under that section; and

(4) If the investigation finds that the information reported was inaccurate, promptly notify each consumer reporting agency to which the furnisher provided inaccurate information of that determination and provide to the consumer reporting agency any correction to that information that is necessary to make the information provided by the furnisher accurate.

(f) Frivolous or irrelevant disputes. (1) A furnisher is not required to investigate a direct dispute if the furnisher has reasonably determined that the dispute is frivolous or irrelevant. A dispute qualifies as frivolous or irrelevant if:

(i) The consumer did not provide sufficient information to investigate the disputed information as required by paragraph (d) of this section;

(ii) The direct dispute is substantially the same as a dispute previously submitted by or on behalf of the consumer, either directly to the furnisher or through a consumer reporting agency, with respect to which the furnisher has already satisfied the applicable requirements of the Act or this section; provided, however, that a direct dispute is not substantially the same as a dispute previously submitted if the dispute includes information listed in paragraph (d) of this section that had not previously been provided to the furnisher; or

(iii) The furnisher is not required to investigate the direct dispute because one or more of the exceptions listed in paragraph (b) of this section applies.

(2) Notice of determination. Upon making a determination that a dispute is frivolous or irrelevant, the furnisher must notify the consumer of the determination not later than five business days after making the determination, by mail or, if authorized by the consumer for that purpose, by any other means available to the furnisher.

(3) Contents of notice of determination that a dispute is frivolous or irrelevant. A notice of determination that a dispute is frivolous or irrelevant must include the reasons for such determination and identify any information required to investigate the disputed information, which notice may consist of a standardized form describing the general nature of such information.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (10 in the last 5 years), 2021–2025 · leading case: Tanethia Holden v. Holiday Inn Club Vacations Inc., 98 F.4th 1359 (11th Cir. 2024).
Tanethia Holden v. Holiday Inn Club Vacations Inc., 98 F.4th 1359 (11th Cir. 2024). “§ 1681s-2(a)(8) (directing the CFPB to prom- ulgate regulations for direct disputes); 12 C.F.R. § 1022.43 USCA11 Case: 22-11014 Document: 69-1 Date Filed: 04/24/2024 Page: 12 of 18 12 Opinion of the Court 22-11014 (regulations related to direct disputes); 15 U.”
Shelly Milgram v. Chase Bank USA, N.A., 72 F.4th 1212 (11th Cir. 2023). “§ 1681s-2(a)(8) (directing the CFPB to promulgate regula- tions for direct disputes); 12 C.F.R. § 1022.43 (regulations related to direct disputes); 15 U.”
Prosser v. Capital One Bank (usa), N.A. (S.D. Ind. 2021). · cites it 4× “They argue that Prosser is alleging a violation of Section 1681s-2(a)(8)2 of the FCRA and 12 C.F.R. § 1022.43 by asserting that the Capital One Defendants failed to properly respond to (1) his January 30, 2020 letter requesting information about the primary account holder on the…”
Ad Astra Recovery Servs., Inc. v. Heath (D. Kan. 2021). · cites it 2× “§ 1681s-2(a)(8)(F); 12 C.F.R. § 1022.43 (f). An investigation is also not required when “the furnisher has a reasonable belief” that a CRO submitted or prepared the dispute for the consumer or the dispute is submitted on a form supplied to a consumer by a CRO.”
Whiting (E.D. Mich. 2025). · cites it 2× “2012) (citing 4 While 12 C.F.R. § 1022.43 (a)-(f) mandates that a furnisher must conduct an investigation upon receipt of a direct dispute, the Sixth Circuit has consistently held that a private right of action for a violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act under 15 U.”
Nelson v. Experian Info. Solutions Inc (N.D. Ala. 2023). “” 12 CFR § 1022.43 (b)(1)(i); 16 CFR § 660.”
Ad Astra Recovery Servs., Inc. v. Heath (D. Kan. 2021). “12 C.F.R. § 1022.43 (b)(2). Lexington Law is registered as a credit services organization in both Utah and California under those states’ statutes regarding credit repair agencies, which are similar in definition to CRO under the federal statute.”
Pritchett v. Westlake Portfolio Mgmt., LLC (N.D. Ala. 2024). “§ 1681s-2(a)(8); 12 C.F.R. § 1022.43 (regulations related to direct disputes); 15 U.”
DeVaughn v. Equifax Info. Servs., LLC (M.D. Ala. 2025). “or repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed; (2) where allowing amendment would cause undue prejudice to the opposing party; or (3) where amendment would be futile,” a district court need not allow amendment).”
Keller v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc. (M.D.N.C. 2025). “” 12 C.F.R. § 1022.43 (a)(3). The allegations in Keller’s first amended complaint fail to plausibly set out how Experian’s immediate forwarding of Keller’s first dispute letter might have led Keller to obtain his desired mortgage loan, leaving the court to only speculate.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.