13 C.F.R. § 134.1211

Decision on appeal

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Time limits and contents. The Judge will issue his or her decision within 45 calendar days after the close of record, as practicable. The decision will contain findings of fact and conclusions of law, the reasons for such findings and conclusions, and any relief ordered. The decision will be served upon appellant and SBA utilizing the OHA Case Portal.

(b) Initial decision. The Judge's decision on the appeal is an initial decision. However, unless a request for reconsideration is filed pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section or the SBA Administrator, solely within the Administrator's discretion, decides to review or reverse the initial decision pursuant to paragraph (d) of this section, an initial decision shall become the final decision of SBA 30 calendar days after its service. The discretionary authority of the Administrator does not create any additional rights of appeal on the part of an appellant not otherwise specified in SBA regulations in this chapter. Any decision pursuant to this subpart applies only to the PPP and does not apply to SBA's 7(a) Loan Program generally or to any interpretation or application of the regulations in part 120 or 121 of this chapter.

(c) Reconsideration. An initial decision of the Judge may be reconsidered. If a request for reconsideration is filed and the SBA Administrator does not exercise discretion to review or reverse the initial decision under paragraph (d) of this section, OHA will decide the request for reconsideration and OHA's decision on the request for reconsideration is a reconsidered initial OHA decision.

(1) Either SBA or appellant may request reconsideration by filing with the Judge and serving a petition for reconsideration within 10 calendar days after service of the Judge's decision. The request for reconsideration must clearly show an error of fact or law material to the decision. SBA does not have to have filed a response to the borrower's appeal petition to request reconsideration of the initial decision of the Judge.

(2) The Judge may also reconsider a decision on his or her own initiative within 20 calendar days after service of the Judge's decision.

(3) A reconsidered initial OHA decision becomes the final decision of SBA 30 calendar days after its service unless the SBA Administrator, solely within the Administrator's discretion, decides to review or reverse the reconsidered initial OHA decision under paragraph (d) of this section. The discretionary authority of the Administrator does not create any additional rights of appeal on the part of an appellant not otherwise specified in SBA regulations in this chapter.

(d) Administrator review. Within 30 calendar days after the service of an initial OHA decision or a reconsidered initial OHA decision of a Judge, the SBA Administrator, solely within the Administrator's discretion, may elect to review and/or reverse an initial OHA decision or a reconsidered initial OHA decision. In the event that the Administrator elects to review and/or reverse an initial OHA decision and a timely request for reconsideration of a Judge's initial decision is also filed by an appellant pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section, the Administrator will consider such request for reconsideration. The Administrator's decision will become the final decision of the SBA upon issuance.

(e) Precedent. Neither initial nor final decisions rendered by OHA under this subpart are precedential.

(f) Publication. Final decisions are normally published without redactions on OHA's website. PPP decisions will likely contain confidential business and financial information and/or personally identifiable information. Therefore, OHA, within its full discretion, may publish final decisions issued under this section with any necessary redactions.

(g) Appeal to Federal district court. Final decisions may be appealed to the appropriate Federal district court only.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2024–2025 · leading case: Musclemakers, Inc. v. United States Small Bus. Admin., Off. of Capital Access (N.D.N.Y. 2024).
Musclemakers, Inc. v. United States Small Bus. Admin., Off. of Capital Access (N.D.N.Y. 2024). · cites it 2× “1211 (g) for judicial review of a final agency decision by the United States Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Office of Hearings and Appeals (“OHA”) denying Plaintiffs’ appeal from a Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) loan review decision by the SBA Office of Capital…”
Mold Cable, Inc v. Us Small Bus. Admin. (D.N.J. 2025). · cites it 2× “at 19 (citing 13 C.F.R. § 134.1211 (c)),) “A request for reconsideration must clearly show an error of fact or law material to the decision.”
Seville Indus. LLC v. U S Small Bus. Admin. (W.D. La. 2024). “In accordance with 13 C.F.R. § 134.1211 (g), Plaintiff timely filed an appeal of the SBA’s final agency decision in this Court.”
The Vinegar Factory, Inc. v. The United States Small Bus. Admin. (S.D.N.Y. 2024). “at 7-8 (conceding that the SBA’s decisions in this case are “appealable in this Court” (citing 13 C.F.R. § 134.1211 (g))). and does not opine on Defendants’ subject-matter jurisdiction arguments and proceeds to the merits.”
Seville Indus. v. SBA (5th Cir. 2025). “See 13 C.F.R. § 134.1211 (g) _____________________ 2 Although not at issue in this litigation, the amount calculated for Seville’s total PPP loan was incorrect in a few respects, which Seville admits.”
Crouse Health Hosp., Inc. v. United States Small Bus. Admin. (N.D.N.Y. 2025). “(quoting 13 C.F.R. § 134.1211 (e))). In its petition for reconsideration, Plaintiff again discussed the five nonprofit hospitals, pointing out that, according to “SBA’s own data, each of these hospitals have over 500 employees,” and that “SBA’s own data indicates that each of…”
— 13 C.F.R. § 134.1211(c) — 1 case
Mold Cable, Inc v. Us Small Bus. Admin. (D.N.J. 2025). “at 19 (citing 13 C.F.R. § 134.1211 (c)),) “A request for reconsideration must clearly show an error of fact or law material to the decision.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.