(a) No certificate holder may allow the boarding of carry-on baggage on an airplane unless each passenger's baggage has been scanned to control the size and amount carried on board in accordance with an approved carry-on baggage program in its operations specifications. In addition, no passenger may board an airplane if his/her carry-on baggage exceeds the baggage allowance prescribed in the carry-on baggage program in the certificate holder's operations specifications.
(b) No certificate holder may allow all passenger entry doors of an airplane to be closed in preparation for taxi or pushback unless at least one required crewmember has verified that each article of baggage is stowed in accordance with this section and § 121.285 (c) and (d).
(c) No certificate holder may allow an airplane to take off or land unless each article of baggage is stowed:
(1) In a suitable closet or baggage or cargo stowage compartment placarded for its maximum weight and providing proper restraint for all baggage or cargo stowed within, and in a manner that does not hinder the possible use of any emergency equipment; or
(2) As provided in § 121.285 (c) and (d); or
(3) Under a passenger seat.
(d) Baggage, other than articles of loose clothing, may not be placed in an overhead rack unless that rack is equipped with approved restraining devices or doors.
(e) Each passenger must comply with instructions given by crewmembers regarding compliance with paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), and (g) of this section.
(f) Each passenger seat under which baggage is allowed to be stowed shall be fitted with a means to prevent articles of baggage stowed under it from sliding forward. In addition, each aisle seat shall be fitted with a means to prevent articles of baggage stowed under it from sliding sideward into the aisle under crash impacts severe enough to induce the ultimate inertia forces specified in the emergency landing condition regulations under which the airplane was type certificated.
(g) In addition to the methods of stowage in paragraph (c) of this section, flexible travel canes carried by blind individuals may be stowed—
(1) Under any series of connected passenger seats in the same row, if the cane does not protrude into an aisle and if the cane is flat on the floor; or
(2) Between a nonemergency exit window seat and the fuselage, if the cane is flat on the floor; or
(3) Beneath any two nonemergency exit window seats, if the cane is flat on the floor; or
(4) In accordance with any other method approved by the Administrator.
[Docket 24996, 52 FR 21476, June 5, 1987, as amended by Amdt. 121-251, 60 FR 65935, Dec. 20, 1995]
Notes of Decisions
Ass'n of Flight Attendan v. Michael Huerta, 785 F.3d 710 (D.C. Cir. 2015).
· cites it 5× “240 on the ground that “the FAA impermissibly and substantially altered and effectively amended 14 C.F.R. § 121.589 , the regulation that pertains to carry-on baggage on an aircraft,” without adhering to the notice and comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act…”
Cont'l Airlines, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc., 277 F.3d 499 (4th Cir. 2002).
· cites it 2× “” 14 C.F.R. § 121.589 (a) (2001). In compliance with this regulation, each airline has published an FAA tariff stating numerical and size limitations on carry-on luggage that it may enforce.”
Meyer v. United Airlines, Inc., 112 N.E.3d 487 (Oh. Ct. App. 6th Dist. Lucas 2018).
· cites it 5× “{¶ 13} To establish the duty and applicable standard of care, appellants here specifically point to the regulations codified in 14 C.F.R. 121.589, which cross-references 14 C.”
Meyer v. United Airlines, Inc., 2018 Ohio 2595 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
· cites it 5× “{¶ 13} To establish the duty and applicable standard of care, appellants here specifically point to the regulations codified in 14 C.F.R. 121.589, which cross-references 14 C.”
Okeke-Henry v. Sw. Airlines, Co., 163 A.3d 1014 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017).
“She also, for the first time, suggested that her claims were not preempted by the FAA after previously conceding that they were and acknowledging that an amendment to her complaint was necessary to salvage her claims.”
Bomanski v. US Airways Grp., Inc., 620 F. Supp. 2d 725 (E.D. Pa. 2009).
“589 (b), which provides that an aircraft may not push back from the gate “unless at least one required crewmember has verified that each article of baggage is stowed in accordance with this section.” This regulation is inapplicable, however, because as Plaintiff admits in her…”
Okeke-Henry, C. v. Sw. Airlines Co., 163 A.3d 1014 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017).
“She also, for the first time, suggested that her claims were not preempted by the FAA after previously conceding that they were and acknowledging that an amendment to her complaint was necessary to salvage her claims.”
Rivlin v. Zimmer Biomet (E.D. Pa. 2021).
“Although the plaintiff referenced 14 C.F.R. § 121.589 (b) and (c) in her brief, the court found that those regulations outlined crewmember responsibilities before takeoff.”
— 14 C.F.R. § 121.589(b) — 2 cases
Meyer v. United Airlines, Inc., 112 N.E.3d 487 (Oh. Ct. App. 6th Dist. Lucas 2018).
“{¶ 13} To establish the duty and applicable standard of care, appellants here specifically point to the regulations codified in 14 C.F.R. 121.589, which cross-references 14 C.”
Meyer v. United Airlines, Inc., 2018 Ohio 2595 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).
“{¶ 13} To establish the duty and applicable standard of care, appellants here specifically point to the regulations codified in 14 C.F.R. 121.589, which cross-references 14 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.