C.F.R. » Title 14 » CHAPTER II—OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION PROCEEDINGS) › SUBCHAPTER D—SPECIAL REGULATIONS › PART 382—NONDISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY IN AIR TRAVEL › Subpart B—Nondiscrimination and Access to Services and Information

14 C.F.R. § 382.31

May carriers impose special charges on passengers with a disability for providing services and accommodations required by this rule?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this part you must not, as a carrier, impose charges for providing facilities, equipment, or services that this rule requires to be provided to passengers with a disability. You may charge for services that this part does not require.

(b) You may charge a passenger for the use of more than one seat if the passenger's size or condition (e.g., use of a stretcher) causes him or her to occupy the space of more than one seat. This is not considered a special charge under this section.

[Doc. No. DOT-OST-2004-19482, 73 FR 27665, May 13, 2008, as amended at 78 FR 67914, Nov. 12, 2013]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1998–2004 · leading case: Elizabeth NEWMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Am. AIRLINES, INC., Defendant-Appellee, & Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive, Defendants, 176 F.3d 1128 (9th Cir. 1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Elizabeth NEWMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Am. AIRLINES, INC., Defendant-Appellee, & Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive, Defendants, 176 F.3d 1128 (9th Cir. 1999). · cites it 2× “Under 14 C.F.R. § 382.31 , however, “[cjarrier personnel .”
Ruta v. Delta Airlines, Inc., 322 F. Supp. 2d 391 (S.D.N.Y. 2004). “14 C.F.R. §§ 382.31 and 382.65; see also Love, 310 F.”
Price v. Delta Airlines, Inc., 5 F. Supp. 2d 226 (D. Vt. 1998). “§ 44902 (b); 14 C.F.R. § 382.31 (d). The pilot testified that the flight attendant reported to him that the odor was so bad that she felt nauseated, and might not be able to perform her duties.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.