14 C.F.R. § 91.173
ATC clearance and flight plan required
No person may operate an aircraft in controlled airspace under IFR unless that person has—
(a) Filed an IFR flight plan; and
(b) Received an appropriate ATC clearance.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1976–1996 · leading case: Shellenberger v. Tanner, 227 S.E.2d 266 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).
Shellenberger v. Tanner, 227 S.E.2d 266 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976). “To this end an owner is required to have the plane inspected every twelve months for airworthiness (every 100 hours of service time if the aircraft is operated for hire) and every twenty-four months for altimeter system tests; in addition all defects affecting airworthiness are…”
Erickson Air-Crane Co. v. United Tech. Corp., 743 P.2d 747 (Or. Ct. App. 1987). “At trial there was evidence that Erickson had failed to comply with federal aviation regulations by failing to maintain records of life-limited parts, 14 CFR § 91.173 (a)(2)(ii), and to make certain that the aircraft conformed to type certificate data sheets.”
Cappello v. Duncan Aircraft Sales of Florida, Inc., 79 F.3d 1465 (6th Cir. 1996). “14 C.F.R. § 91.173 (“ATC clearance and flight plan required.”
United States v. Intercon Leasing, Inc., 617 F. Supp. 323 (S.D. Fla. 1985). “On April 24, 1979, the FAA requested Intercon and Harvey that pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 91.173 (c) the maintenance records of the aircraft be presented.”
United States v. Airways Serv., Inc., 429 F. Supp. 843 (N.D. Iowa 1977). “6 Therefore: (a) Defendant Airways is in violation of 14 CFR § 91.173 (a)(2)(v) for failure to keep records of compliance with A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.