C.F.R. » Title 14 » CHAPTER I—FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION › SUBCHAPTER F—AIR TRAFFIC AND GENERAL OPERATING RULES › PART 91—GENERAL OPERATING AND FLIGHT RULES › Subpart A—General

14 C.F.R. § 91.19

Carriage of narcotic drugs, marihuana, and depressant or stimulant drugs or substances

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no person may operate a civil aircraft within the United States with knowledge that narcotic drugs, marihuana, and depressant or stimulant drugs or substances as defined in Federal or State statutes are carried in the aircraft.

(b) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to any carriage of narcotic drugs, marihuana, and depressant or stimulant drugs or substances authorized by or under any Federal or State statute or by any Federal or State agency.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2019–2024 · leading case: Siegel v. Adm'r of the Fed. Aviation Admin. & Nat'l Transp. Saf. Bd., 916 F.3d 1107 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Siegel v. Adm'r of the Fed. Aviation Admin. & Nat'l Transp. Saf. Bd., 916 F.3d 1107 (D.C. Cir. 2019). · cites it 10× “14 C.F.R. § 91.19 . Under published FAA enforcement guidance, violation of 14 C.”
James Fejes, Jr. v. Faa (9th Cir. 2024). · cites it 3× “The panel also rejected Fejes’s argument that his conduct was exempt under FAA regulation 14 C.F.R. § 91.19 . The FAA did not rely on 14 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.