14 C.F.R. § 91.321

Carriage of candidates in elections

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) As an aircraft operator, you may receive payment for carrying a candidate, agent of a candidate, or person traveling on behalf of a candidate, running for Federal, State, or local election, without having to comply with the rules in parts 121, 125 or 135 of this chapter, under the following conditions:

(1) Your primary business is not as an air carrier or commercial operator;

(2) You carry the candidate, agent, or person traveling on behalf of a candidate, under the rules of part 91; and

(3) By Federal, state or local law, you are required to receive payment for carrying the candidate, agent, or person traveling on behalf of a candidate. For federal elections, the payment may not exceed the amount required by the Federal Election Commission. For a state or local election, the payment may not exceed the amount required under the applicable state or local law.

(b) For the purposes of this section, for Federal elections, the terms candidate and election have the same meaning as set forth in the regulations of the Federal Election Commission. For State or local elections, the terms candidate and election have the same meaning as provided by the applicable State or local law and those terms relate to candidates for election to public office in State and local government elections.

[Docket FAA-2005-20168, 70 FR 4982, Jan. 31, 2005]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2011–2024 · leading case: Flight Options v. State, Dept. of Revenue, 259 P.3d 234 (Wash. 2011).
Flight Options v. State, Dept. of Revenue, 259 P.3d 234 (Wash. 2011). “14 C.F.R. § 91.321 merely authorizes receipt of payment for carrying a candidate for election where federal, state, or local law require such payment.”
Flight Options, LLC v. Dep't of Revenue, 172 Wash. 2d 487 (Wash. 2011). “14 C.F.R. § 91.321 merely authorizes receipt of payment for carrying a candidate for election where federal, state, or local law require such payment.”
RBG Bush Planes, LLC v. Alaska Pub. Offices Comm'n, 361 P.3d 886 (Alaska 2015). · cites it 4× “" 14 C.F.R. § 91.321 (a)(3). 4 . Bush Planes intended to bill the candidates for half of the fuel used on each flight.”
Boulder Falcon v. Brown (D. Utah 2024). “23 : Truth-in-leasing clause requirement in leases and conditional sales contracts; • 14 C.F.R. § 91.321 : Carriage of Candidates in Elections; • 14 C.”
— 14 C.F.R. § 91.321(a) — 1 case
RBG Bush Planes, LLC v. Alaska Pub. Offices Comm'n, 361 P.3d 886 (Alaska 2015). “" 14 C.F.R. § 91.321 (a)(3). 4 . Bush Planes intended to bill the candidates for half of the fuel used on each flight.”
— 14 C.F.R. § 91.321(a)(8) — 1 case
RBG Bush Planes, LLC v. Alaska Pub. Offices Comm'n, 361 P.3d 886 (Alaska 2015). “" 14 C.F.R. § 91.321 (a)(3). 4 . Bush Planes intended to bill the candidates for half of the fuel used on each flight.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.