16 C.F.R. § 3.71
Authority
Except while pending in a U.S. court of appeals on a petition for review (after the transcript of the record has been filed) or in the U.S. Supreme Court, a proceeding may be reopened by the Commission at any time in accordance with § 3.72. Any person subject to a Commission decision containing a rule or order which has become effective, or an order to cease and desist which has become final may file a request to reopen the proceeding in accordance with § 2.51.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1970–1989 · leading case: Removatron Int'l Corp. & Frederick E. Goodman v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 884 F.2d 1489 (1st Cir. 1989).
Removatron Int'l Corp. & Frederick E. Goodman v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 884 F.2d 1489 (1st Cir. 1989). “55 , nor sought a reopening of the proceedings, 16 C.F.R. §§ 3.71 , 3.72. The petitioners have not taken the appropriate steps to preserve this issue.”
Chrysler Corp. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 561 F.2d 357 (D.C. Cir. 1977). “72 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 16 C.F.R. §§ 3.71 -.72, to reopen the proceeding for the limited purpose of filing “new documentary evidence,” which was attached to the motion.”
Rsr Corp. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 656 F.2d 718 (D.C. Cir. 1981). “See 16 C.F.R. § 3.71 (1980). 14 . The communications allegedly took place immediately after the Commission received RSR’s initial request to reopen on October 29, 1979.”
Leon A. Tashof v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 437 F.2d 707 (D.C. Cir. 1970). “29 (a), as amended 16 C.F.R. §§ 3.71 , 3.172(a) (1970).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.