16 C.F.R. § 453.4

Required purchase of funeral goods or funeral services

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Casket for cremation provisions—(1) Unfair or deceptive acts or practices. In selling or offering to sell funeral goods or funeral services to the public, it is an unfair or deceptive act or practice for a funeral provider, or a crematory, to require that a casket be purchased for direct cremation.

(2) Preventive requirement. To prevent this unfair or deceptive act or practice, funeral providers must make an alternative container available for direct cremations, if they arrange direct cremations.

(b) Other required purchases of funeral goods or funeral services—(1) Unfair or deceptive acts or practices. In selling or offering to sell funeral goods or funeral services, it is an unfair or deceptive act or practice for a funeral provider to:

(i) Condition the furnishing of any funeral good or funeral service to a person arranging a funeral upon the purchase of any other funeral good or funeral service, except as required by law or as otherwise permitted by this part;

(ii) Charge any fee as a condition to furnishing any funeral goods or funeral services to a person arranging a funeral, other than the fees for: (1) Services of funeral director and staff, permitted by § 453.2(b)(4)(iii)(C); (2) other funeral services and funeral goods selected by the purchaser; and (3) other funeral goods or services required to be purchased, as explained on the itemized statement in accordance with § 453.3(d)(2).

(2) Preventive requirements. (i) To prevent these unfair or deceptive acts or practices, funeral providers must:

(A) Place the following disclosure in the general price list, immediately above the prices required by § 453.2(b)(4) (ii) and (iii): “The goods and services shown below are those we can provide to our customers. You may choose only the items you desire. If legal or other requirements mean you must buy any items you did not specifically ask for, we will explain the reason in writing on the statement we provide describing the funeral goods and services you selected.” Provided, however, that if the charge for “services of funeral director and staff” cannot be declined by the purchaser, the statement shall include the sentence: “However, any funeral arrangements you select will include a charge for our basic services” between the second and third sentences of the statement specified above herein. The statement may include the phrase “and overhead” after the word “services” if the fee includes a charge for the recovery of unallocated funeral provider overhead;

(B) Place the following disclosure in the statement of funeral goods and services selected, required by § 453.2(b)(5)(i): “Charges are only for those items that you selected or that are required. If we are required by law or by a cemetery or crematory to use any items, we will explain the reasons in writing below.”

(ii) A funeral provider shall not violate this section by failing to comply with a request for a combination of goods or services which would be impossible, impractical, or excessively burdensome to provide.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2000–2013 · leading case: Powers v. Harris, 379 F.3d 1208 (10th Cir. 2004).
Powers v. Harris, 379 F.3d 1208 (10th Cir. 2004). “Although the FTC prohibits funeral directors from charging a direct "casket-handling fee” to recoup revenue lost from the sale of the casket, see 16 C.F.R. § 453.4 (b)(l)(ii), many funeral directors simply raise the overall price of non-declinable fees for all customers.”
Craigmiles v. Giles, 110 F. Supp. 2d 658 (E.D. Tenn. 2000). “16 C.F.R. § 453.4 (b)(1). Caskets can be purchased via the Internet.”
Baudino v. SCI California Funeral Servs., Inc., 169 Cal. App. 4th 773 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008). “( 16 C.F.R. § 453.4 (b)(l)(n) (2008).) 5 *784 C.”
Maryland Attorney Gen. Opinion 98 OAG 003 (Md. Att'y Gen. 2013). “” 16 C.F.R. § 453.4 (b)(1)(i). 2 Eskin, writing in 1999, identified Alabama as the only state that did not regulate pre-need funeral contracts, but it has since enacted legislation that does so.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.