19 C.F.R. § 159.41

Antidumping duties

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Antidumping duties will be assessed in accordance with part 351, chapter III of this title.

[T.D. 80-271, 45 FR 75641, Nov. 17, 1980, as amended by CBP Dec. 12-21, 77 FR 73309, Dec. 10, 2012]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1994–2018 · leading case: Sunpreme Inc. v. United States, Solarworld Americas, Inc., 892 F.3d 1186 (Fed. Cir. 2018).
Sunpreme Inc. v. United States, Solarworld Americas, Inc., 892 F.3d 1186 (Fed. Cir. 2018). “19 C.F.R. §§ 159.41 , 159.47, 351.211. When Customs determines a duty order covers entered merchandise, it suspends liquidation and notifies the importer of "determined or estimated" duties.”
Sandvik Steel Co. v. United States, Fujitsu Ten Corp. of Am. v. United States, 164 F.3d 596 (Fed. Cir. 1998). “See 19 C.F.R. §§ 159.41 , 351.211. When Customs believes an antidumping order covers entered merchandise, it “suspends” liquidation and notifies the importer of “determined oy estimated” antidumping duties.”
Timken Co. v. United States, 18 Ct. Int'l Trade 1 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1994). · cites it 2× “§ 1500 (1988); 19 C.F.R. § 159.41 (1991). ITA has no responsibility for or ability to direct how Customs carries out the ITA’s suspension and liquidation instructions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.