19 C.F.R. § 171.24
Remission of forfeitures and payment of fees, costs or interest
Any seizure subject to forfeiture may be remitted or mitigated pursuant to the provisions of 19 U.S.C. 1618 or 31 U.S.C. 5321, as applicable. Any person who accepts a remission or mitigation decision will not be considered to have substantially prevailed in a civil forfeiture proceeding for purposes of collection of any fees, costs or interest from the Government.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1985–1998 · leading case: United States v. United States Currency in the Amount of $2,857.00, 754 F.2d 208 (7th Cir. 1985).
United States v. United States Currency in the Amount of $2,857.00, 754 F.2d 208 (7th Cir. 1985). “In this case, Raymer filed a petition for remission or mitigation of forfeiture with the DEA on January 7, 1983.”
United States v. Modes, Inc., 723 F. Supp. 811 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1989). “The Court notes that 19 C.F.R. § 171.24 regarding limitations on consideration of petitions and 19 C.”
United States v. Maxi Switch, Inc., 18 F. Supp. 2d 1040 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1998). “See 19 C.F.R. § 171.24 (“No action shall be taken on any petition if the civil liability has been referred to the Department of Justice.”
United States v. Rotek, Inc., 22 Ct. Int'l Trade 503 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1998). “19 C.F.R. § 171.24 (1997). If Rotek’s argument was limited to the lack of response to its Supplemental Petition, the answer would be clear.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.