22 C.F.R. § 51.73

Privacy of hearing

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Only the person requesting the hearing, his or her attorney, an interpreter, the hearing officer, the reporter transcribing the hearing, and employees of the Department concerned with the presentation of the case may be present at the hearing. Witnesses may be present only while actually giving testimony or as otherwise directed by the hearing officer.

[83 FR 21876, May 11, 2018]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1973–1974 · leading case: Berrigan v. Sigler, 499 F.2d 514 (D.C. Cir. 1974).
Berrigan v. Sigler, 499 F.2d 514 (D.C. Cir. 1974). · cites it 2× “37 The Parole Board, having exercised its statutory discretion to establish as a general rule that parolees would not be allowed to travel to certain foreign countries, and having permitted an exception when the objective, reasonable tests of 22 C.F.R. § 51.73 are met, should…”
Berrigan v. Sigler, 475 F.2d 918 (D.C. Cir. 1973). “22 C.F.R. § 51.73 provides: § 51.73 Special validation of passport for travel to restricted areas.”
Berrigan v. Sigler, 499 F.2d 514 (D.C. Cir. 1974). · cites it 3× “26 When the case was last before this court there had been merely an informal advice that the Department of State was of the view that insofar as it could perceive there was no basis for its determining that appellants' proposed travel to North Vietnam would be in the national…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.